Posted: May 13th, 2018

Week 5 Assignment 1.2 Topic is Cloning

Question description

PREVIOUS WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT & TOPIC CHOOSEN…..Cloning:  Playing GOD or practicing medicine?                                         Week 3 Assignment 1.1:Topic Selection and Thesis Statement Cloning has been a pinnacle debate in the science community since its discovery, asking the question are we tampering with the natural order of creation.Stem cell research is regarded as the next path to eradicating deadly diseases and disorders. It seems very dangerous to clone humans, which based on history in regards to racism, social-economic barriers, and slavery; surely will create an opportunity to view the new species as second class humans. But limited genetic research on gene sequencing and genetic coding on an adaptive level will help unlock answers to our own species. But we can’t be sure what opportunity for genetic mutation until there are enough generations of case study.Cloning is a leading scientific area of study, but Einstein theory to defy the law of nature to split an atom has cause a range of uses including carbonated beverages to an atomic nuclear .bomb. So clearly history shows what is created for the advancement of man, can lead him also to ruin when vision is clouded by greed. Therefore, I feel we must continue to ban human cloning, and only use cloning strictly for stem cell research and medical use or to harvest vital organ for human transplants.ReferencesGenetic Science Learning Center (2014, January 14) Stem Cell Quick Reference. Learn.Genetics. Retrieved February 03, 2014, from http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/stemcells/quickref/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (2013, September 30) Information on Stem Cell Research Retrieved February 03, 2014, from (https://monkessays.com/write-my-essay/ninds.nih.gov/research/stem_cell/ Bellomo, Michael. The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fiction, and the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political, and Religious Debate of Our Time. New York: AMACOM, 2006.Week 5 Assignment 1.2 SKIP TO COURSE MENUSKIP TO TOP FRAME TABSContentWeek 5 Assignment 1.2 SubmissionClick the link above to submit your assignment.Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center.Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.Assignment 1.2: OutlineDue Week 5 and worth 100 pointsIn this assignment, you will create an outline of the main points of the sociological issues in which you are interested. This will serve as the basis for your Assignment 1.4: Investigate a Social Issue Final Paper. (Note: Students please use the Purdue Owl Website to assist you with this assignment. This Website can be accessed at https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/2/2/55/Write a one to two (1-2) page outline in which you:Restate your thesis statement and its overarching main points.Determine three (3) main points related to the sociological event you have chosen.Explore each of the three (3) main points you have illustrated and provide at least two (2) examples that support each of your main points.  (Note: You can explore them in order of importance, chronologically, or compare / contrast.)Determine counter arguments and provide examples of why these arguments should be examined in relation to the main points being explored. Conclude your outline with a summary of the thesis statement, main points, and counter argument(s).Use three (3) credible sources and APA citations where appropriate.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Write a word essay – Evaluate the various methodologies for sociological research.Apply the sociological perspective to a variety of socioeconomic and political problems.Critically examine how society shapes individuals and how individuals shape society.Use technology and information resources to research issues in sociology.Write clearly and concisely about sociology using proper writing mechanics.~ Hire our professional writers now and experience the best assignment help online with our custom paper writing service. We ensure your essays and assignments are expertly researched, written and delivered on time. ~ Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.Points: 100Assignment 1.2: OutlineCriteriaUnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% DFair70-79% CProficient80-89% BExemplary90-100% A1. Restate your thesis statement and its overarching main points.Weight:  10%Did not submit or incompletely restated your thesis statement and its overarching main points.Insufficiently restated your thesis statement and its overarching main points.Partially restated your thesis statement and its overarching main points.Satisfactorily restated your thesis statement and its overarching main points.Thoroughly restated your thesis statement and its overarching main points.2. Determine three (3) main points related to the sociological event you have chosen.Weight: 15%Did not submit or incompletely determined three (3) main points related to the sociological event you have chosen.Insufficiently determined three (3) main points related to the sociological event you have chosen.Partially determined three (3) main points related to the sociological event you have chosen.Satisfactorily determined three (3) main points related to the sociological event you have chosen.Thoroughly determined three (3) main points related to the sociological event you have chosen.3. Explore each of the three (3) main points you have illustrated and provide at least two (2) examples that support each of your main points.Weight: 15%Did not submit or incompletely explored each of the three (3) main points you have illustrated and did not submit or incompletely provided at least two (2) examples that support each of your main points.Insufficiently explored each of the three (3) main points you have illustrated and insufficiently provided at least two (2) examples that support each of your main points.Partially explored each of the three (3) main points you have illustrated and partially provided at least two (2) examples that support each of your main points.Satisfactorily explored each of the three (3) main points you have illustrated and satisfactorily provided at least two (2) examples that support each of your main points.Thoroughly explored each of the three (3) main points you have illustrated and thoroughly provided at least two (2) examples that support each of your main points.4. Determine counter arguments and provide examples of why these arguments should be examined in relation to the main points being explored.Weight: 15%Did not submit or incompletely determined counter arguments and did not submit or incompletely  provided examples of why these arguments should be examined in relation to the main points being explored.Insufficiently determined counter arguments and insufficiently provided examples of why these arguments should be examined in relation to the main points being explored.Partially determined counter arguments and partially provided examples of why these arguments should be examined in relation to the main points being explored.Satisfactorily determined counter arguments and satisfactorily provided examples of why these arguments should be examined in relation to the main points being explored.Thoroughly determined counter arguments and thoroughly provided examples of why these arguments should be examined in relation to the main points being explored.5. Conclude your outline with a summary of the thesis statement, main points, and counter argument(s).Weight: 15%Did not submit or incompletely concluded your outline with a summary of the thesis statement, main points, and counter argument(s).Insufficiently concluded your outline with a summary of the thesis statement, main points, and counter argument(s).Partially concluded your outline with a summary of the thesis statement, main points, and counter argument(s).Satisfactorily concluded your outline with a summary of the thesis statement, main points, and counter argument(s).Thoroughly concluded your outline with a summary of the thesis statement, main points, and counter argument(s).6. 3 referencesWeight: 5%No references providedDoes not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.7. Writing / Support for ideasWeight: 5%Never uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.Rarely uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.Partially uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.Mostly uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.Consistently uses reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.8. Writing / Grammar and mechanicsWeight: 5%Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.Numerous errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.Consistently free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.9. Writing and Information Literacy / Integration of SourcesWeight: 5%Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism or failure to use in-text citations.Sources are rarely integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations.Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations.Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations.Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, using in-text citations.10. Information Literacy / Crediting Sources in APAWeight: 5%Lack of citations and / or lack of reference section and / or citations don’t correspond to listed references.In-text citations and references are given, but not in APA format.Partially shows correct (or approximately correct) use of in-text citations, with matching references using APA format.Mostly shows correct use of in-text citations  with matching references using APA formatConsistently shows correct use of In-text citations with matching references using APA format.11. Information Literacy / ResearchWeight: 5%Quantity and / or quality of sources are unacceptable.Too few references (one or fewer) and / or references are of poor quality.Number of sources is less than expected (two or fewer) and / or the quality of sources is questionable.Number of sources is sufficient (minimum of three) and the quality of sources is mostly good.Number of sources is sufficient (minimum of three) and the quality of sources is good.

Order | Check Discount