Order For Similar Custom Papers & Assignment Help Services

Fill the order form details - writing instructions guides, and get your paper done.

Posted: December 9th, 2021

W7A3

Now that you have identified an LMS for your organization, you need to determine several assets that you would include in your courses or training. You will also need to decide if the material will be delivered synchronously, asynchronously, or as a hybrid of the two.

Write a two to four (2-4) page paper in which you:
1. Determine at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS. Note: At least two (2) of the assets that you determine should be interactive.

2. Determine the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously, asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset that you have identified and how the related delivery modality will work the best for your organization. Provide a rationale for your response.

3. Create an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives that support your learning assets and provide one (1) sample for each chosen learning asset for the curriculum.
Note: The samples can be short and simple depending on your course topic. The goal is to test whether the assets work functionally in the LMS. The sample file pages are not included in the required assignment page length.
Note: You may use assets that you created from others courses (e.g., EDU 522, etc.).

4. Specify the key stakeholders who are responsible for managing the assets and what criteria they will use to manage.

5. Analyze how each asset enhances the educational goals of your course and examine the way(s) in which the LMS supports those goals.  

6. Provide at least three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1] used previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the paper’s claims.

7.  Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
a.  Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
b.  Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
c.  Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Compare synchronous, asynchronous, and hybrid learning methods.
· Identify appropriate instructional materials for use within an LMS.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues in technology tools to manage learning.
· Write clearly and concisely about issues in technology tools to manage learning using proper writing mechanics.
  
Designing Curriculum for Your  LMS
 
Criteria

Unacceptable
Below 70% F

Fair
70-79% C

Proficient
80-89% B

Exemplary
90-100% A
 
1. Determine at least   four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video, discussion, test /   quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS. Note: At   least two (2) of the assets that you determine should be interactive.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or   incompletely determined at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g.,   lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the   LMS.

Partially determined at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g.,   lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the   LMS.

Satisfactorily determined at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g.,   lecture, video, discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the   LMS.

Thoroughly determined   at least four (4) different learning assets (e.g., lecture, video,   discussion, test / quiz, etc.) that can be integrated in the LMS.
 
2. Determine the   delivery modality (i.e., synchronously, asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for   each asset that you have identified and how the related delivery modality   will work the best for your organization. Provide a rationale for your   response.
  Weight: 15%

Did not submit or   incompletely determined the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously,   asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset that you have identified and   how the related delivery modality will work the best for your organization.   Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially determined the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously,   asynchronously, or as a hybrid) for each asset that you have identified and   how the related delivery modality will work the best for your organization.   Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily   determined the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously, asynchronously, or as   a hybrid) for each asset that you have identified and how the related   delivery modality will work the best for your organization. Satisfactorily   provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly determined the delivery modality (i.e., synchronously, asynchronously,   or as a hybrid) for each asset that you have identified and how the related   delivery modality will work the best for your organization.   Thoroughlyprovided a rationale for your response.
 
3. Create an outline   of five (5) curriculum objectives that support your learning assets and   provide one (1) sample for each chosen learning asset for the curriculum.
Note: The samples can be short and simple depending on your course   topic. The goal is to test whether the assets work functionally in the LMS.   The sample file pages are not included in the required assignment page   length.
Note: You may use assets that you created from others courses (e.g.,   EDU 522, etc.).
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or   incompletely created an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives that   support your learning assets; did not submit or incompletely provided one (1)   sample for each chosen learning asset for the curriculum.

Partially created an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives that   support your learning assets; partially provided one (1) sample for each   chosen learning asset for the curriculum.

Satisfactorily created an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives that   support your learning assets; satisfactorilyprovided one (1) sample for each   chosen learning asset for the curriculum.

Thoroughly created an outline of five (5) curriculum objectives that   support your learning assets; thoroughlyprovided one (1) sample for each   chosen learning asset for the curriculum.
 
4. Specify the key   stakeholders who are responsible for managing the assets and what criteria   they will use to manage.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or   incompletely specified the key stakeholders who are   responsible for managing the assets and what criteria they will use to   manage.

Partially specified the key stakeholders who are responsible for managing   the assets and what criteria they will use to manage.

Satisfactorily   specified the key stakeholders who are responsible for managing the assets   and what criteria they will use to manage.

Thoroughly specified the key stakeholders who are responsible for managing   the assets and what criteria they will use to manage.
 
5. Analyze how each   asset enhances the educational goals of your course and examine the way(s) in   which the LMS supports those goals.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or   incompletely analyzed how each asset enhances the   educational goals of your course; did not submit or incompletely examined the way(s) in which the LMS supports those goals.

Partially analyzed how each asset enhances the educational goals of your   course; partially examined the way(s) in which the LMS supports those goals.

Satisfactorily   analyzed how each asset enhances the educational goals of your course;   satisfactorily examined the way(s) in which the LMS supports those goals.

Thoroughly analyzed how each asset enhances the educational goals of your   course; thoroughly examined the way(s) in which the LMS supports those goals.
 
6. Provide at least   three (3) reliable, relevant, peer-reviewed references (no more than one [1]   used previously), published within the last five (5) years that support the   paper’s claims.
Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the   required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of   required references; most references high quality choices.

Meets number of   required references; all references high quality choices.
 
7. Writing Mechanics,   Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent   errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of   errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors   in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost   error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
 
8. Appropriate use of   APA in-text citations and reference section
Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text   citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and   references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in   APA style.

Most in-text citations   and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in   APA style.

In-text citations and   references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted   correctly in APA style.
 
9. Information   Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the   integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or   failure to use in-text citations.

Sources are partially   integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and   summarizing.

Sources are mostly   integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and   summarizing.

Sources are   consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing,   and summarizing.
 
10. Clarity and   Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%

Information is   confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that   logically support ideas.

Information is   partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support   ideas.

Information is mostly   clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically   support ideas.

Information is   provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and   evidence that logically support ideas.

Order | Check Discount

Paper Writing Help For You!

Special Offer! Get 20-25% Off On your Order!

Why choose us

You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver

Professional Writers

We assemble our team by selectively choosing highly skilled writers, each boasting specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and a robust background in academic writing

Discounted Prices

Our service is committed to delivering the finest writers at the most competitive rates, ensuring that affordability is balanced with uncompromising quality. Our pricing strategy is designed to be both fair and reasonable, standing out favorably against other writing services in the market.

AI & Plagiarism-Free

Rest assured, you'll never receive a product tainted by plagiarism or AI-generated content. Each paper is research-written by human writers, followed by a rigorous scanning process of the final draft before it's delivered to you, ensuring the content is entirely original and maintaining our unwavering commitment to providing plagiarism-free work.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Nurscola, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.