Posted: September 10th, 2021

The Gettysburg Address

In your discussion, state the purpose of the reading and cite the thesis statement (if applicable). If there is no explicit thesis, state the reading’s claim. Then, lay out the structure of the reading to the class, and let the class know if this structure is organized and logical (you may claim that it is not organized – it’s up to you). Let the reader know how this method of organization helps or does not help the author’s purpose. Then, discuss the style of writing – does the style help the author prove his/her point? Finally, study the introduction and conclusion of your chosen reading. Explain how the author ‘hooks’ the reader in, or, conversely, if the introduction is not strong, explain why. Discuss the conclusion of the essay as well, and point out its strengths and weaknesses. Please answer these questions fully in your response (use thoughtful sentences). In your response, cite the essay at least once using an in-text citation. (See this link for a good example of how to cite an article inside of an essay: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/2/ Also, create a works cited citation for the essay. This should be in MLA style. Respond to students who chose articles different than your post. Please post a full and rich discussion. Be careful with your essay choice. Most likely, you will want to use this work for your essay due next week. In addition, remember that the more effort you put into your discussion, the more prepared you will be to write your Critical Evaluation essay. In your responses, find a student who chose a different essay than yours. Do you agree with your classmate’s interpretation of that essay? Did your classmate pick out the correct thesis statement/claim? Your goal in your responses is to help your classmate strengthen his/her interpretation of the author’s approach to his/her subject matter.
Deadline 15-08-2018: 2024 – Write My Essay For Me | Essay Writing Service For Your Papers Online
More details Place a bid
11
Title Montaigne, intellectual respondent
Assignment type Term paper
Discipline Literature
Description For this essay, you will enter into a philosophical dialogue with either Machiavelli or Montaigne. Choose either a chapter from The Prince (at most two chapters) or any one of the assigned essays from Montaigne. Your role is intellectual respondent: you are responding to one of these thinkers with your own perspective, shaped by your experience and education. You do not need to cite any outside sources, but you certainly may do so if you wish. In responding, you should point to evidence of some kind. It might be the case that you cite Montaigne in order to respond to something Machiavelli says – or vice versa. References to previous thinkers in the course—Pico, Boccaccio, Erasmus, Martin Luther, et al. (or your Rockstar) OR thinkers you’ve read —could also help you respond. But again, such references are not required. Your evidence can be personal experience, contemporary events, historical events, etc. In a sense, your role is not unlike one scholar responding to another scholar—or one person responding to another person in a public debate or editorial/blog/etc. ONE CAVEAT: You CANNOT simply AGREE with the writer you pick. You must challenge, question, complicate, correct, or add to the writer’s position in some illuminating way. It’s okay to say something like, “Montaigne/Machiavelli was generally correct on this point, but what he does not recognize (or did not foresee) is _________.” YOU MAY OFFER EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF A POINT/IDEA EXPRESSED BY THE AUTHOR, BUT THIS KIND OF ANALYSIS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO ONE OR TWO EXAMPLES AT MOST. The key is to add valuable/new perspective and insight to the writer’s ideas, and you have the benefit of more than 400 years of history to draw upon in doing so. Admin details: 5 pages, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, MS Word (not .pdf), MLA format (parenthetical citations), page numbers and name at top right, etc.

Order | Check Discount