Order For Similar Custom Papers & Assignment Help Services

Fill the order form details - writing instructions guides, and get your paper done.

Posted: January 31st, 2023

The assignment 6 and 7 I attached are references and annotated bibliographies that I’ve found. Can you write two version of the thesis based on my researches? It is about the death penalty. Please see

The assignment 6 and 7 I attached are references and annotated bibliographies that I’ve found. Can you write two version of the thesis based on my researches? It is about the death penalty. Please see the Assignment 8 below.

Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Attachment 3

ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Download attachment

Assignment 8 CCJ 300
Craft and upload at least two versions of your thesis statement, based on the research
you’ve done so far. Remember, the more effort you put into your thesis statement now the
easier your paper process will be. I will provide as much feedback as I can based upon
what you provide.

ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Download attachment

1
References
Bedau, H. (2002). The minimal invasion argument against the death penalty.
Criminal Justice
Ethics
,
21
(2), 3-8.
Carrabine, E. (2011). The Iconography of Punishment: Execution Prints and the Death
Penalty.
The Howard Journal Of Criminal Justice
,
50
(5), 452-464.
Ciuca, A. The Death Row: An Argument for Death Penalty Abolition?.
SSRN Electronic Journal
.
CUSTER, O. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap). ANGLING FOR A STRANGLEHOLD ON THE DEATH PENALTY.
The
Southern Journal Of Philosophy
,
50
, 160-173.
Death sentence. (2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers).
New Scientist
,
192
(2574), 16.
Deokin Lee,. (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer). The Justification on the Abolition of Death Penalty – The Judicial Murder
and Wrongful Convictions of the Death Penalty -.
CHUNG_ANG LAW REVIEW
,
12
(2),
111-140.
Finkelstein, C. An A Priori Argument Against the Death Penalty.
SSRN Electronic Journal
.
Flanders, C. (2013). The Case Against the Case Against the Death Penalty.
New Criminal Law
Review: An International And Interdisciplinary Journal
,
16
(4), 595-620.
FRITSCH, M. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap). DERRIDA ON THE DEATH PENALTY.
The Southern Journal Of
Philosophy
,
50
, 56-73.
Greenberg, D., & West, V. (2008 – Affordable Custom Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay from Pro Writers). Siting the Death Penalty Internationally.
Law & Social
Inquiry
,
33
(2), 295-343.

View the Answer

2
Gudorf, C. (2013). Christianity and Opposition to the Death Penalty: Late Modern
Shifts.
Dialog
,
52
(2), 99-109.
Hawkins, G. Against the death penalty.
Psyccritiques
,
36
(2).
Kaufman, S. (2016: 2024 – Do my homework – Help write my assignment online). Mourners in the Court: Victims in Death Penalty Trials, through the Lens of
Performance.
Law & Social Inquiry
.
Ki-Choon Song,. (2013). Declaration in Celebration of the 11th Anniversary of World Day
against the Death Penalty.
Democratic Legal Studies
,
null
(53), 384-386.
Kirchgässner, G. (2011). Econometric Estimates of Deterrence of the Death Penalty: Facts or
Ideology?.
Kyklos
,
64
(3), 448-478.
NAAS, M. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap). THE PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE OF THE DEATH PENALTY:
TWO SIDES OF THE SAME SOVEREIGN.
The Southern Journal Of Philosophy
,
50
, 39-
55. Roberts-Cady, S. (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer). Against Retributive Justifications of the Death Penalty.
Journal
Of Social Philosophy
,
41
(2), 185-193.
SAGHAFI, K. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap). THE DEATH PENALTY, IN OTHER WORDS, PHILOSOPHY.
The
Southern Journal Of Philosophy
,
50
, 136-142.
Schmidt, J. (2007). The EU Campaign against the Death Penalty.
Survival
,
49
(4), 123-134.
Seal, L. (2011). Ruth Ellis and Public Contestation of the Death Penalty.
The Howard Journal Of
Criminal Justice
,
50
(5), 492-504.
Seneadza, O. (2011). The death penalty in Ghanaian law and practice: can its retention in
contemporary time be justified?.
Commonwealth Law Bulletin
,
37
(1), 115-133.

Show entire document

ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Download attachment

Annotated Bibliography
Finkelstein, C. An A Priori Argument Against the Death Penalty.
SSRN Electronic Journal
.
Article summary and purpose:
This article stipulates that the challengers of the death
penalty base their arguments on the contingent features that are in its administration. It is
presented in this article that the death penalty is basically applied discriminatorily since the
innocent at some situations are executed or in other situations, insufficient evidence is given
to administration of the death penalty to an individual. This is a pertinent source as it if offers
more information on the death penalty abolition.
Gudorf, C. (2013). Christianity and Opposition to the Death Penalty: Late Modern
Shifts.
Dialog
,
52
(2), 99-109.
Article summary and purpose:
This article by Christian Gudorf examines the shifts within
Christian thoughts as well as other denominations on the death penalty to today`s church
from the early church in the US. It further explores the ethical issues within the capital
punishment administration both prior and after the Supreme Court halted executions in 1972.
This information is vital to my thesis as it provides evidence of why people should switch
from the death penalty to other forms of punishment.
Bedau, H. (2002). The minimal invasion argument against the death penalty.
Criminal Justice
Ethics
,
21
(2), 3-8.
Article summary and purpose:
This article presents a discussion concerning the minimal
invasion argument in opposition to the death penalty. This argument holds that the death
penalty does not satisfy the necessary requirement for a justified punishment. Accordingly,
this source will provide vital information in regard to opposing the death penalty.

View the Answer

Ciuca, A. The Death Row: An Argument for Death Penalty Abolition?.
SSRN Electronic
Journal
.
Article summary and purpose:
This source explores on the abolition of the death penalty. It
points out the demerits of the death penalty in relation to the right of humanity. It
comprehensively discusses on how death penalty, like other scholars, does not satisfy the
intent of punishment. The argument presented in this article, therefore, suits my thesis.
Death sentence. (2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers).
New Scientist
,
192
(2574), 16.
Article summary and purpose:
This article studies on the death sentence and highlights the
pros and cons of using it as a form of punishment. It has cases where the death penalty has
been used and its consequences. Therefore, this source is reliable as it will provide with
arguments against the death penalty.
Deokin Lee, (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer). The Justification on the Abolition of Death Penalty – The Judicial
Murder and Wrongful Convictions of the Death Penalty -.
CHUNG_ANG LAW
REVIEW
,
12
(2),
Article summary and purpose:
In this article, Deokin (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) observes that there exist no
alternatives or reform measures except death penalty abolition not to make innocent men and
victims being accused wrongfully. The author argues that it is important and obtains concrete
evidence before sentencing one to a death penalty. I find this source useful as it offers more
insight in regard to a death penalty.
Flanders, C. (2013). The Case Against the Case Against the Death Penalty.
New Criminal
Law Review: An International And Interdisciplinary Journal
,
16
(4), 595-620.
Article summary and purpose:
The author observes in this article that there are 3 key
theories of punishment, rehabilitative, retributive and deterrent. This, therefore, according to

Show entire document

Order | Check Discount

Paper Writing Help For You!

Special Offer! Get 20-25% Off On your Order!

Why choose us

You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver

Professional Writers

We assemble our team by selectively choosing highly skilled writers, each boasting specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and a robust background in academic writing

Discounted Prices

Our service is committed to delivering the finest writers at the most competitive rates, ensuring that affordability is balanced with uncompromising quality. Our pricing strategy is designed to be both fair and reasonable, standing out favorably against other writing services in the market.

AI & Plagiarism-Free

Rest assured, you'll never receive a product tainted by plagiarism or AI-generated content. Each paper is research-written by human writers, followed by a rigorous scanning process of the final draft before it's delivered to you, ensuring the content is entirely original and maintaining our unwavering commitment to providing plagiarism-free work.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with Nurscola, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.