Professional Writers
We assemble our team by selectively choosing highly skilled writers, each boasting specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and a robust background in academic writing
You Can Order For A Similar Custom Written Paper 24/7!
For all college assessment assignments, fill the order form with the requested details and get your essays done promptly.
Posted: September 25th, 2022
Sexual Discrimination
Sexual Discrimination
#-4 paragraphs on your personal opinion of the Price Waterhouse v Hopkins 490 US 228, 109 S ct 1775 1989
3-4 paragraphs – do you agree with the court or disagree with the findings – and why
Sexual Discrimination
Ann Hopkins sued Price Water under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253 for not receiving a re-proposal for partnership. Title VII holds that employment decision or reconsideration should be made based on sexual discrimination, and the employer may not only be held liable under Title VII by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made even if it had not taken gender into account. Therefore, Hopkins had substantial reason to sue Price Water since it was the obligation of the Price Water not to discriminate her on the bases of sexual gender. Additionally, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission holds that Title VII’s prohibition of discrimination of employment based on sex incorporates the prohibition of gender identity and sexual orientation expression with regard to employment. With the impermissible motive having been identified to play a role in the employment decision, it was upon the defendant to provide proof that the employment decision was made based on provided merits and legitimate reasons.
The Supreme Court decision was made based on Title VII conventional rules of civil litigation. The Court held that the Hopkins had proved based on Title VII that gender played a motivation part in the decision of employment, however, it was upon the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it would have made the same decision even if it had not taken plaintiff’s gender into conduct in order to avoid a finding of liability (Justia, 2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers). In support of the Supreme Court decision, the Plaintiff was able to demonstrate the role of impermissible motive in the employment decision making placing the burden on the defendant to justify that it would have made the same decision in the absence of the unlawful motive.
References
Justia. (2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers). Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989). Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/490/228/
Tags: Sexual Discrimination
Why choose us
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Discounted Prices
Our service is committed to delivering the finest writers at the most competitive rates, ensuring that affordability is balanced with uncompromising quality. Our pricing strategy is designed to be both fair and reasonable, standing out favorably against other writing services in the market.
AI & Plagiarism-Free
Rest assured, you'll never receive a product tainted by plagiarism or AI-generated content. Each paper is research-written by human writers, followed by a rigorous scanning process of the final draft before it's delivered to you, ensuring the content is entirely original and maintaining our unwavering commitment to providing plagiarism-free work.
How it works
When you decide to place an order with Nurscola, here is what happens: