Posted: May 13th, 2022

Reflection Paper essay

Current Sociology Monograph
2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay, Vol. 62(4) 550–567
© The Author(s) 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0011392114524510
csi.sagepub.com
CS
The sociology of gender in
Southern perspective
Raewyn Connell
University of Sydney, Australia
Abstract
In its founding generations, sociology was greatly concerned with gender, as part of
its theorizing of the world of colonialism and empire. Sociology then focused on the
global metropole, so its analysis of gender in the decades since the Women’s Liberation
movement has been developed in a Northern container. This can now change, if the
extraversion of sociology around the global South can be overcome. The thematics
of gender analyses in the periphery highlight historical processes of the formation and
disruption of gender orders, dealing with issues of violence and land. The work of a
number of gender theorists and researchers from the South is discussed. The material
conditions of knowledge formation in developing countries have to be recognized, as
well as the differing ways intellectuals in the South handle influences from the metropole.
New issues have emerged in the sociology of gender as a neoliberal world order has
taken shape, producing new patterns of masculinized power as well as pathways of
change for women.
Keywords
Gender, globalization, patriarchy, postcolonial, sociology, southern theory
Introduction
Gender research is, today, one of the major fields of sociology, both academic and
applied. The sociology of gender has had significant impact in the education and health
sectors, in violence prevention, antidiscrimination and equal opportunity policy. As an
organized field, however, it is not yet strongly influenced by the postcolonial revolution
in knowledge.
Corresponding author:
Raewyn Connell, University of Sydney, Faculty of Education and Social Work A35, Sydney, NSW 2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers,
Australia.
Email: raewyn.connell@sydney.edu.au
524510 CSI0010.1177/0011392114524510Current SociologyConnell
research-article2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay
Article
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 551
In this article I explore how the sociology of gender can be developed in the light of
Southern theory and Southern research. This is not a small task, not a matter of creating
a postcolonial corner inside the sociology of gender. The issue concerns foundational
concepts and methods, global relations of power and centrality in knowledge production.
The analysis must be grounded in an understanding of the history of sociology, but also
needs to engage contemporary global developments in feminist thought.
I start with the changing place of gender issues in the discipline of sociology, how
sociology in the global North has tried to theorize global issues, and how both metropole
and periphery are embedded in a global economy of knowledge. I then turn to intellectual work in the global South, first considering some of the distinctive themes that emerge
from gender analyses in the periphery, then sociology-of-knowledge questions about the
production of knowledge and configurations of knowledge. Finally, I discuss the view of
gender relations on a world scale that is tentatively emerging from these starting-points.
I am conscious that this article addresses a vast terrain and can offer only a few details
from a rich literature. The material is drawn mainly from sub-Saharan Africa, parts of
Latin America, India and Australia; a longer treatment would also consider gender analysis in the مساعدة التعيين – خدمة كتابة المقالات من قبل كبار الكتاب العرب, Arab world, East and Central Asia, and more. I hope this is enough to document
the need for change and show some of the directions of movement.
Sociology and gender
The place of gender in sociology is debated, and has changed. A quarter-century ago, US
colleagues spoke of ‘the missing feminist revolution in sociology’ (Stacey and Thorne,
1985). The revolution at that time was not so much missing as refused. Sociology clung
to a foundation story in which the discipline was invented by a group of white male
founding fathers preoccupied with European modernity and its experience of industrialization, class conflict, alienation and bureaucracy. There was little place for gender in this
story.
It is true that white men were central to the creation of sociology as a cultural project.
But the group was larger than the Marx–Weber–and–Durkheim foundation myth usually
acknowledges, and its history is much more interesting. Nineteenth-century sociology in
the global metropole drew much of its data from the colonized world. It had a great deal
to say about gender and race. In fact these were key issues for the first two generations
of sociologists.
These issues were seen, however, from the point of view of the colonizing powers.
The discipline of sociology was constructed as a debate among the intellectuals of the
imperial centre about the world that global imperialism had encountered or created. In
Comtean sociology, as I will call the dominant form of the discipline c. 1850–1920, difference between the metropole and the colony, interpreted as ‘progress’, was sociology’s
key organizing concept.
The status of women was commonly seen as an index of progress. The evolution of
sexuality, household and marriage was a theme of great interest to Comtean sociologists.
Spencer, whose Principles of Sociology (1893–1896 [1874–1877]) was probably the
most influential sociology book ever written, wrote at length about ‘domestic institutions’, meaning family, kinship and the status of women. Ward, the most prominent
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
552 Current Sociology Monograph 2 62(4)
among the founders of North American sociology, wrote in Dynamic Sociology (1897) at
even greater length about sexuality, gender differences and ‘sexuo-social inequalities’.
Engels’ interest in the ‘origin of the family’ is famous. Sumner’s Folkways (1934 [1906])
was stuffed with details about kinship, sex, marriage, prostitution and incest; and more
examples could be given.
Northern sociology’s twentieth-century history involved a partial retreat from imperial concerns and a sharp retreat from the Comtean framework, to focus on social difference and social conflict within the society of the metropole (Connell, 2007). It was a
more restricted version of sociology, with its research technology of censuses, surveys
and urban ethnography, that was exported to the rest of the world during the Cold War
era, and became the basis of academic and policy sociology as we know it today.
In the mainstream sociology of the mid-twentieth century, gender issues were mainly
understood as questions about the domestic order inside metropolitan society. This was
the era of ‘sex role’ concepts, as understood in the USA by Parsons (Parsons and Bales,
1956) and Komarovsky (1950). Change in gender norms was certainly recognized by
these writers. But their conceptualization of sex roles was addressed to the functioning
and normative integration of Northern society, understood as a closed system. The first
phase of feminist sociology in the 1970s offered a more critical evaluation of norms and
roles, now seen as restrictions on women’s freedom, without immediately changing the
conceptual framework.
Nevertheless sociology under the impact of the women’s movement paid more attention to gender issues than most academic disciplines. Gender is currently one of the largest fields of empirical sociology. Journals such as Gender and Society publish a stream
of research on the gendered division of social labour, gender patterns in culture, gendered institutions, gender identities, sexuality, household structures, and more. Sociology
became the main base for theoretical analysis of gender relations as one of the main
structures of the societies we live in (Barrett, 1980; Walby, 2009).
In the last generation, the themes of the sociology of gender have continued to evolve.
Studies of sexuality have become more prominent, influenced by the urgency of the
struggle with HIV/AIDS (Dowsett, 1996). The appalling scale of gender-based violence
around the world has become clear, though we are still far from having adequate theories
about this (Small Arms Survey, 2011). Gender patterns in schooling, the subject of several waves of public controversy, have become increasingly important issues in the sociology of education. Under the influence of post-structural thought since the 1980s, the
discursive construction of gender identity, and the instability of gender identity, have
become major themes. In this context, questions about patterns of embodiment displaced
the old nature/nurture quarrel.
Sociology as a discipline has been greatly enriched by this work. The injustice,
violence and distress that unequal gender relations produce are widely recognized as
key concerns for applied sociology. The development of the sociology of gender over
the last generation is, all things considered, a notable achievement of progressive
social thought.
It must be said, however, that the sociology of gender has developed essentially within
the framework of twentieth-century Northern sociology, with its post-Comtean
preoccupation with the society of the global metropole. Northern theorists provide the
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 553
field’s leading ideas and Northern methodologists its main research techniques. This
situation is in urgent need of change.
Northern gender analysis and the global dimension
The situation has already begun to change. In the last 20 years it has become normal for
Anglophone gender scholarship to acknowledge global issues. The number of papers
recorded in the ISI Web of Knowledge database whose titles or abstracts combined the
term ‘globalization’ with a gender term rose 10-fold between the early 1990s and early
2000s. Collections of ethnographic, historical or thematic studies from around the
periphery such as Women’s Activism and Globalization (Naples and Desai, 2002) are
now an established publishing genre. So are integrative international surveys of knowledge, such as Gender, Work and Economy: Unpacking the Global Economy (Gottfried,
2013).
Influential sociologists in the metropole now try to formulate their conceptual analyses at a world level. Notable examples are Chow’s (2003) argument on the gendered
character of globalization; Acker’s (2004) sociology of the gender processes in global
capitalism; Unterhalter’s (2007) global analysis of gender and social justice in education;
and Cockburn’s (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) analysis of gender relations, militarization and war.
This scholarship on global gender is illuminating and productive, but contains a deepseated problem. Acker (2004: 17) refers to ‘the mostly Western scholarship on gender
and globalization’, and – setting aside some doubts about the concept ‘Western’ – she is
right. It isn’t only that Europe and the United States publish most of the world’s journals
and that most of the articles in them are about Europe and the United States. Most scholarly gender analysis remains in the conceptual world of Marx, Foucault, de Beauvoir and
Butler even when it is talking about sexuality in India, identity in Australia, migration in
the Mediterranean or factories in Mexico.
If we look back into the history of gender research, it is clear that data acquired by
European colonial conquest and postcolonial dependency have been very important to
metropolitan theorists. Mohanty’s famous essay ‘Under Western eyes’ (1991) revealed
the colonial gaze that constructed a false image of the ‘third world woman’. But even this
understated the importance of knowledge from the periphery.
The colonized world provided raw material for metropolitan feminist debates about
the origin of the family, matriarchy, the gender division of labour, the Oedipus complex,
third genders, male violence and war, marriage and kinship, gender symbolism – and
now, of course, globalization. Such pivotal feminist texts as Mitchell’s Psychoanalysis
and Feminism (1974), Rubin’s ‘The traffic in women’ (1975) and Chodorow’s The
Reproduction of Mothering (1978) would be inconceivable without the colonial knowledge on which Freud, Lévi-Strauss and other mighty men of the metropole built their
theories.
Gender analysis, then, is involved in a global political economy of knowledge. Global
imperialism left no culture separate or intact, not even the culture of the imperialists. The
colonial encounter, continuing as the encounter of contemporary communities with globalized power, is itself a massive source of social dynamics – including intellectual
innovation.
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
554 Current Sociology Monograph 2 62(4)
This is the territory now being explored in a vigorous literature on the global dynamics of knowledge. The strands of this literature include research on Southern theory
(Connell, 2007; Meekosha, 2011), alternative traditions in social science (Alatas, 2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers;
Patel, 2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer), postcolonial sociology (Bhambra, 2007; Reuter and Villa, 2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer), indigenous
knowledge (Odora Hoppers, 2002), the psychology of liberation (Montero, 2007), decolonial thought (Mignolo, 2007; Quijano, 2000), the decolonization of methodology
(Smith, 1999) and more. In the context of this article it would be superfluous to discuss
this whole terrain, but my analysis of the sociology of gender has a specific starting-point
within it. This is the global sociology of knowledge developed by the Beninese philosopher Paulin Hountondji in Endogenous Knowledge (1997; see Connell, 2011).
Hountondji observes that imperialism created a global division of labour in the sciences, in which data were collected in the colonies and concentrated in the metropole,
where theory was developed and the data were processed. This division of labour persisted after decolonization. The global periphery still exports data and imports applied
science, the global metropole is still the centre of theory and methodology. An international circulation of knowledge workers accompanies the international flows of data,
concepts and techniques. Workers from the periphery travel to the metropole for doctoral
training, sabbaticals, conferences or better jobs; workers from the metropole frequently
travel to the periphery to collect data, rarely to get advanced training or to learn theory.
One of the most striking parts of Hountondji’s analysis concerns the attitude of knowledge workers in the global periphery resulting from this global structure. This attitude he
calls ‘extraversion’ – being oriented to external sources of intellectual authority.
Extraversion is seen in practices such as citing only metropolitan theorists, publishing
preferentially in metropolitan journals, joining ‘invisible colleges’ centred in the metropole, and acting as native informants for metropolitan scientists who are interested in the
periphery.
We can add to Hountondji’s analysis the powerful influence of neoliberal politics and
management. Neoliberal agendas are currently deepening extraversion by locking the
universities of the periphery into market competition and global ranking systems – in
which the elite universities of the United States and Europe always appear on top, defining the ‘excellence’ others must strive for. Scholars in the periphery are now under heavier
pressure than ever to publish in metropolitan journals, gain recognition in the metropole
and form partnerships with prestigious centres.
Extraversion in this sense is as widespread in gender studies as in other fields of
knowledge. Metropolitan texts about gender are translated and read in the periphery, and
treated as authorities. Gender researchers from the periphery travel to the metropole for
qualifications and recognition. Whole frameworks, terrains of debate and problematics
are liable to be imported.
A few examples may illustrate the point. The late Heleieth Saffioti’s A mulher na
sociedade de classes (1978 [1969]) was a towering achievement, yet shaped by structuralist Marxism from Paris. Not even Subaltern Studies was immune to extraversion: the
journal’s main attempt at gender theory, Tharu and Niranjana’s ‘Problems for a contemporary theory of gender’ (1996), defines the problems of Indian feminist politics by
applying postmodernist feminism from the metropole. Bhaskaran’s lively Made in India
(2004), treating sexual diversity, applies queer theory from the USA. The empirical core
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 555
of Masculinities (Connell, 1995) is Australian but its main theoretical sources are
German, British and North American.
But there is always some friction between the intellectual perspectives created in the
imperial centres, and the realities of society and culture in the colonized and postcolonial
world. Nelly Richard (2004 [1993]), importing French postmodernist thought to feminism in Chile, notes that these ideas have to be ‘re-worked’ in the periphery.
We could put this more strongly. The re-working requires a critique and transformation of the metropolitan frameworks themselves. The debates about decolonial thought,
Southern theory, indigenous knowledge and postcolonial thought, though they have
mostly not been gender-informed, are now vital resources for developing the sociology
of gender.
Southern thematics for gender analysis
The necessary starting-point is imperialism itself. Gender dynamics take specific forms
in colonial and postcolonial contexts because, as María Lugones (2007) states, they are
interwoven with the dynamics of colonization and globalization. As Valentine Mudimbe
(1994) has argued, the colonizing power, in order to establish itself, had to create a new
society. It is important to register that the large majority of the world’s people live in such
societies with colonial, neocolonial and postcolonial histories. The global metropole is
the exception, not the norm. Analysis informed by what Lugones has usefully called ‘the
coloniality of gender’ should be the mainstream of the sociology of gender.
Recognition of the fact of colonization has already polarized postcolonial gender analysis. In reaction against Northern feminism, more exactly a simplified version of it, one
school of thought asserts that ‘gender’ is itself a product of colonialism, imposed on societies which previously did not organize themselves in gendered ways. Perhaps the bestknown example is Oyeronke Oyewumi’s The Invention of Women (1997), which contrasts
Western sex dichotomy with ‘a Yoruba stance’ that does not classify people on the basis
of bodies. Accordingly, gender is not a structure of precolonial Yoruba society and
‘women’ does not exist as a social category. This argument has been criticized in Africa as
both an inaccurate account of precolonial society, and as replacing an essentialism of bodies with an essentialism of culture that helps to legitimize postcolonial patriarchy (BakareYusuf, 2003; Lewis, 2002). Powerful men in postcolonial regimes can, and do, fend off
demands for gender equality by branding feminism as a neocolonial intrusion.
Uma Narayan (1998: 103), whose critique of cultural essentialism is exemplary,
defends legitimate generalizations about gender: ‘virtually every community is structured by relationships of gender that comprise specific forms of social, sexual, and economic subjection of women’. This view is complicated by research that shows precolonial
conceptions of gender to be complex and structured differently from European conceptions. Thus Sylvia Marcos (1998), examining the metaphorical religious thought of
Mesoamerican communities in surviving colonial-era documents, finds powerfully
embodied conceptions that emphasize duality, integration and the absence of barriers. On
the other hand, oral-history evidence from Aboriginal people and anthropologists about
precolonial society in Australia points to ritual separation of women and men, as well as
a marked gender division of labour, in that very different civilization (Berndt, 1974).
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
556 Current Sociology Monograph 2 62(4)
Whatever the precolonial situation, it was transformed by colonialism, and not gently.
Gendered violence played a formative role in the shaping of colonial and postcolonial
societies. Colonization itself was a gendered act, carried out by imperial workforces,
overwhelmingly men, drawn from masculinized occupations such as soldiering and
long-distance trade. Colonial violence against women in colonized societies was a
normal part of conquest. The colonial state was built as a power structure operated by
men, based on continuing force. Brutality was built into colonial societies, whether
they were settler colonies or colonies of exploitation. The level of gendered violence
in postcolonial societies is now a central issue in global feminism, from
international policy forums (Harcourt, 2009) to local research and action agendas –
illustrated by the emphasis on gender violence in the women’s studies programmes
in Costa Rica (Cordero, 2008 – Affordable Custom Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay from Pro Writers). Saffioti’s (2004) later work paid close attention to
the issue; she quotes survey data showing about half of Brazilian women have
experienced gender-based violence.
In a powerful paper, Amina Mama (1997) recalls the violence of imperial
patriarchy, the creation of colonial economies that marginalized women, and the
gender dimension of the struggles for independence in Africa. Women widely
supported the nationalist movements, but once in power, few of the nationalist
regimes defended women’s interests. With the economic crisis of the postindependence states that began in the 1970s, very harsh conditions were created for
women, and high levels of violence against women became apparent.
Mama argues convincingly that the feminist strategies against gender violence
devel-oped in the metropole do not apply in this context, because these strategies
presuppose a well-functioning state and a coherent gender order; neither of which is
experienced by Black and working-class women in postcolonial Africa. Nina Laurie
(2005) makes a similar point when discussing masculinity politics in the
contemporary Andes, that research in the global South cannot presuppose a
consolidated gender order. Jane Bennett (2008 – Affordable Custom Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay from Pro Writers: 7) in South Africa describes the
specificity of gender research in conditions where ‘relative chaos, gross economic
disparities, displacement, uncertainty and surprise’ are the norm not the exception.
Gender analysis from the global South thus, in a sense, must invert the problematic of
recent gender theory in the global North, where a deconstructionist agenda is
hegemonic. In the colonial and postcolonial world the making of gender orders, or
the attempts to make them, are central issues. Establishing colonial gender
arrangements required, as well as formative violence, a sustained cultural and
organizational effort on the part of the colonizers. This is rightly emphasized by
Lugones (2007), though I think she is mis-taken to describe gender arrangements as
‘imposed’ on the colonized. Active responses by the colonized were also involved;
and the active responses by women of colonized societies are now well recognized
in feminist historiography and indigenous critique (Moreton-Robinson, 2000).
Less recognized in most of the gender literature are the active responses also made by
men. This issue is explored by Ashis Nandy, whose book The Intimate Enemy: Loss
and Recovery of Self under Colonialism (1983) is a classic study of the social
construction of masculinity. Nandy traces how the pressure of British conquest and the
colonial regime re-shaped Indian culture, including its gender order. The response to
this pressure called out specific elements of Indian tradition, over-valuing the Kshatriya
or warrior category,
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 557
to justify essentially new patterns of masculinity in a modernizing process. Equally
important, Nandy shows how the colonial encounter re-shaped models of masculinity
among the colonizers. As the regime settled into a permanent governing structure during
the nineteenth century, a distinctive culture emerged that exaggerated gender and age
hierarchies. This produced a simplified, dominance-oriented, and often violent masculinity as the hegemonic pattern among the British, despising weakness, suspicious of emotion, concerned to draw and police rigid social boundaries.
More recently, the making of masculinities and negotiation of gender relations in
colonial and postcolonial transitions has been the subject of intense research in southern
Africa (Epstein et al., 2004; Morrell, 2001). This research goes far to establishing two
important conclusions. The first is the sheer diversity of masculinities that are under
construction at the same time in the one national territory. Postcolonial gender reality
cannot be captured by generalized models of ‘traditional’ vs ‘modern’ manhood. The
second is how intimately the making of masculinities is bound up with the vast and continuing transformations of postcolonial society as a whole. Gender is not off to the side
in a cupboard of its own. It is enmeshed with the changing structure of power and shifts
in the economy, the movement of populations and the creation of cities, the struggle
against Apartheid and the 1990s lurch to neoliberalism, the institutional effects of mines,
prisons, armies and education systems.
This illustrates a tendency in postcolonial gender analysis towards a sociological view
of gender. Mara Viveros (2007) from Colombia, in a discussion of the concept of difference, argues that colonialism forged an integral link between gender and race that was
not present in the global North (which has tended to treat these dimensions through
concepts like ‘intersectionality’). Fundamental themes in the gender studies programme
of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia (2009) are the sociocultural conditions constructing gender relations, women’s visibilization, the social inequalities of sexuality and
gender and public policy. Of course there are institutions with greater emphasis on philosophy and culture. But when we factor in the significance of development issues
(Harcourt, 2009), there is a sense in which the sociological approach to gender as a
structure of social relations is central to gender scholarship in the global South, in a way
that is not true in the global North.
This can be seen, for instance, in Chilean discussions of voice and identity. Julieta
Kirkwood’s feminist classic Ser política en Chile (1986) concerns the establishment of
women’s political voice in twentieth-century Chile. This could be treated in terms of
cultural identity, but it is not. A key step in Kirkwood’s research was an interview study
with women’s movement activists under the dictatorship, and she constructs the history
of Chilean feminism as a collective story of social struggle. The emergence of women as
a political subject, in her narrative, was closely bound up with the features of a postcolonial political order, and the changing ways in which Chile’s socioeconomic formation
was articulated with the world economy and international politics. Sonia Montecino
(2001) similarly emphasizes that gender identities are collective constructions, in their
diversity; indeed, she suggests that an understanding of identity as emerging from social
struggle is characteristic of Latin American thought.
As I have argued in Southern Theory (Connell, 2007), the issue of land is crucial in
understanding colonial society, and this applies to gender relations. Marcia Langton
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
558 Current Sociology Monograph 2 62(4)
(1997), a leading Aboriginal intellectual in Australia, shows one dimension of this.
Australian Aboriginal culture has been portrayed as patrilineal and patriarchal, but this
account mainly comes from male anthropologists convinced of women’s inferiority.
Women have increasingly demonstrated that women’s rights were embedded in precolonial land tenure systems. In the conditions of violent conquest, and the extreme pressure
on most Aboriginal cultures that followed, this land-and-gender order was badly disrupted. Langton argues that it was women’s traditions and ties to place – ‘Grandmothers’
law’ – that were the more resilient, and proved crucial in holding Aboriginal society
together. Older women thus became the key to social survival.
Land is also central to the analysis of gender relations in agricultural society in the
Indian subcontinent by Bina Agarwal, whose A Field of One’s Own (1994) is one of the
great classics of modern gender analysis. Agarwal is professionally an economist, but A
Field of One’s Own is actually a rich interdisciplinary exploration of peasant society,
involving regional and legal history, sociology of the family, studies of political movements, and more. Land is shown to be a crucial element in gender practices ranging from
kinship alliance and inheritance to the constitution of patriarchal power structures.
Agarwal documents a vigorous gender politics including collective mobilizations by
women for land ownership and land use, and widespread, sometimes violent, resistance
by men.
To argue there are common themes that emerge from Southern gender studies is not
to imply there is a single Southern gender order. Very certainly, there is not – neither
before nor after colonization. Indeed, recognition of the diversity of gender orders is an
important consequence of the arguments of Southern feminists in forums such as the UN
world conferences on women, from Mexico City in 1975 to Beijing in 1995. Critique of
unexamined universalism in Northern gender theory has been a persistent theme in
African feminist studies (Arnfred et al., 2004), and the arguments apply also within the
global South.
Gender analysis from the global South therefore poses the question of diversity, the
multiplicity of gender forms, not at the level of the individual, but at the level of the
gender order and the dynamic of gender relations on a societal scale.
Conditions and configurations of knowledge
Thematics are one thing, practicalities another. One of the big differences between gender research in the global North and the global South is the scale of resources available
for scholarship. There are some well-resourced universities in the periphery, such as the
federal university system in Brazil, the elite universities in India, the ‘sandstones’ or
‘Group of Eight’ in Australia, the ‘historically white’ universities in South Africa and the
National University of Singapore. Public investment in higher education, currently static
or contracting in the North, has grown in 论文帮助/论文写作服务/负担得起我及时提交我最好的质量 – China and Brazil especially. Smaller resources,
multiplied, might still amount to a significant asset: across Africa, about 30 universities
were teaching gender studies in the early 2000s (Mama, 2005).
None of this, however, is comparable to the scale and wealth of the higher education
systems in Europe and the United States, the publishing industries of the metropole, the
corporate and state-funded research centres (including census bureaux), and therefore
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 559
the workforce potentially engaged in gender research in the global North. With the crisis
of the postcolonial developmental state and the advent of global neoliberalism, gender
research in the South depends to a large degree on NGOs and development aid programmes. As Mama notes, the African university programmes have been struggling with
contradictory demands, staff in need of qualifications and erratic institutional support.
Continent-wide networks and capacity-building programmes have been created, but the
situation is precarious.
The consequences for gender studies are significant. One of the most important is the
framing of much gender research by economic development agendas. The ‘women in
development’ movement of the 1970s, and the ‘gender and development’ framework that
grew out of it, have been important in funding research and providing political legitimacy for gender studies. But the ‘gender framework’ in development work has usually
been categorical, if not essentialist – treating ‘women’ as an undifferentiated natural
category. NGO-based research is generally small-scale, focused on practical problems,
and short-term; not a promising way to develop new perspectives. Dependence on aid
funds means subordination to donor-driven agendas and established formulae which, as
Desiree Lewis (2002) points out for African gender research, marginalizes critique and
intellectual innovation. Teresa Valdés (2007) similarly speaks of a ‘technification of gender knowledge’ in the Southern cone countries of Latin America, as policy research tends
to replace movement-based feminism.
These are among the bases of the extraversion of Southern intellectual work discussed
earlier. The ‘traffic in gender’, to use Claudia de Lima Costa’s (2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers) witty phrase, is
mainly from North to South.
Sometimes this is planned. In the early days of women’s studies in 论文帮助/论文写作服务/负担得起我及时提交我最好的质量 – China, for instance,
the US model of women’s studies was deliberately imported in the 1980s. In the absence
of an autonomous women’s movement, especially after the political crackdown of 1989,
no other base for theory was available. Min Dongchao (2005) notes that research was at
this stage only done if funded from outside, mainly from the United States; it had to be
practical, and expressed in conceptual terms familiar to the donors.
Min also notes, however, that the women engaged in creating Chinese women’s studies were conscious of major gaps between the historical experience of Chinese women
and women in the global North. Costa (2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers) points out a return traffic. For instance,
French post-structuralism, so influential in Anglophone gender studies, was itself influenced by the experience of Francophone North Africa. She also notes the difficulties in
translating concepts from one region to another. For instance the concept ‘women of
colour’, important in challenging essentialism in US gender studies, makes little sense in
other places; while the concept of revolutionary transformation of society, central in
Julieta Kirkwood’s thought, has little grip in the global North.
Cecília Sardenberg (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) in Brazil has recently been exploring another way that
Northern hegemony is contested. The language of ‘women’s empowerment’ has recently
spread in Brazil, in the context of development agendas – it is seen by many as World
Bank jargon (though it originated in feminist activism). But it is possible to inflect such
language in different ways. A group based at the Federal University of Bahia has been
doing just that, rejecting liberal empowerment in favour of ‘liberating empowerment’
directed to transforming the gender order of patriarchal domination.
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
560 Current Sociology Monograph 2 62(4)
Northern wealth and power therefore do not necessarily produce intellectual domination. Nor does the critical response to Northern gender analysis have to be ‘denunciatory’
or engage in ‘castigation’, to use Lewis’s (2007) terms. There can be constructive critical
use of Northern thought, treating it as a resource rather than a framework, and moving
ahead of it on the basis of Southern experience.
An example is a notable piece of sociological theorizing, ‘On the category
“gender”: A theoretical-methodological introduction’, published in 1992 in the Revista
Interamericana de Sociologia by Teresita de Barbieri, a South American sociologist who
settled in Mexico. This paper starts with feminist movements and their hypothesis that
the subordination of women is a question of power, not nature. After reviewing a number
of metropolitan feminist thinkers, especially Gayle Rubin, de Barbieri sets out a line of
analysis centring on social control over women’s reproductive power, and men’s assertion of their rights over offspring. This commits her to a relational view of gender, though
one in which biological capacities are at stake – it is not a disembodied or purely discursive view. De Barbieri sees the relationship between the cultural figures of the mother
and the male head of household as the nucleus of gender relations in Latin American
societies.
But she does not have a binary view of gender. Indeed, she emphasizes the significance of the family life cycle that gives a different social position to post-menopausal
women. Drawing on Brazilian black feminist thought, she explores the interaction of
gender with race and class in a stratified society. She further complicates the picture of
the gender order by laying stress on relations between men, and the class and racial differences among women.
In explicit critique of the simplifications of metropolitan gender analysis, de Barbieri
locates gender relations in the context of the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980s, and
the impact of global restructuring on the popular classes. The result is a sophisticated,
structurally complex picture of the gender order; at least as diversified as, and notably
more dynamic than, the intersectional model emerging in the metropole at the time this
paper was published.
There are, however, problems that more strongly resist interaction with Northern
categories of gender analysis. This can be seen in a fascinating study in historical sociology, Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens (2003). ‘Caste’
is not capable of being cross-classified with ‘gender’ in the style of North American
intersectional sociology. Rather, caste is gender in a unique configuration. Chakravarti
pictures the Indian caste system as a deep-seated structure of privilege and exclusion
that combines gender hierarchy, property ownership, religious ideology and social
identity. Caste is a hierarchical system of endogamous groups, making exclusive marriage its key institution. Control over women’s sexuality is therefore crucial to the
maintenance of male lineages. An ideology of purity, focused on women but also
affecting men, provides the cultural rationale. Upper caste women become complicit in
this system, as their conformity to patriarchal prescriptions is what guarantees their
access to privilege.
Chakravarti traces how this gender order came into existence, over a long historical
period. The caste system was associated with the consolidation of an agricultural economy and a state structure, rationalized by Brahmanical intellectuals. A flexible social
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 561
order allowed some caste mobility, and created a patchwork of different castes in different parts of the country. Colonialism did little directly to change this, as the British imperial regime drew upper castes into the colonial state and gave them Western-style
education. Nevertheless the caste system was always contested. In its early stages it was
challenged by no less a figure than the Buddha. In the late colonial period it was challenged by Phule, Ambedkar and others speaking for the ‘untouchables’. But it remains
powerful in postcolonial India, enforced by violence as well as ideology – violence
directed at lower caste men as well as women who break the rules.
Taking these initiatives and examples together, we can imagine a global configuration
of gender research very different from the Northern-centred patterns of the past generation. It has gradually been accepted that there are irreducible differences between feminist perspectives. But it is also argued that dialogue across such divides is possible
(Bulbeck, 1998). Not only dialogue, but active political cooperation across national borders, and conceptions of feminism on a global scale, are increasingly visible elements of
gender politics (Naples and Desai, 2002). Chandra Talpade Mohanty (2003) nicely summarizes this in the idea of ‘feminism without borders’.
Ashwini Tambe (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) has recently offered an intriguing model of ‘transnational
feminist studies’ that contests the metropole-centred narrative of development, the
homogenizing vision of essentialist global feminism, and even the kind of metropole/
periphery model used in this article. Local feminisms differ from national, she rightly
observes, and may have distant links. Mara Viveros (2007) also notes the importance of
South–South alliances in getting beyond the mosaics of liberal conceptions of difference
and the hierarchies that are the legacy of colonialism. To change social structures still
requires a decolonizing practice; and in this practice, the connection between the personal and the political can be re-established.
Gender and the neoliberal world order
Quijano’s (2000) fruitful concept of the coloniality of power explicitly applies to the
time after national independence as well as before. An examination of the coloniality of
gender similarly has to attend to historical continuities in global power. But global power
relations have changed; the old empires have gone, and new formations of power have
appeared. It is now necessary to understand gender in the era of transnational corporations, the Internet and global neoliberal politics. This requires gender analysis to move
beyond states and even regions into what Elisabeth Prügl (1999), in a study of homebased work and the ILO, calls ‘global space’.
There is now considerable industrial-sociology research on this interplay in sites such
as the garment and microprocessor factories of Southeast Asia, the south 论文帮助/论文写作服务/负担得起我及时提交我最好的质量 – China economic miracle, or the maquiladora industries of northern Mexico (e.g. Elias, 2004). The
gender effects are much more than economic. This becomes clear when we reflect on the
toxic conjunction of US-dominated free trade, labour migration, narcotráfico, corruption, poverty and masculine cultures of violence that has produced femicide in Ciudad
Juárez (Dominguez-Ruvalcaba and Corona, 2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer).
There has been less attention in gender studies to the groups privileged by gender
relations in the most powerful institutions of the neoliberal global economy and political
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
562 Current Sociology Monograph 2 62(4)
order. Of the 500 largest transnational corporations in 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap, as listed by Fortune magazine, just 2.6% had women as chief executives; which is to say, 97.4% had men. We have
some beginnings of knowledge about this heavily masculinized arena, in studies of the
hegemonic forms of masculinity among the managerial cadres of transnational corporations and local businesses involved in the international economy (Elias, 2008 – Affordable Custom Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay from Pro Writers; Olavarría,
2009). There is a great deal to be done to fill out the empirical picture, to link these studies to theory, and to link the theorization of gender to contemporary understandings of
neoliberalism and the modern security state.
It is important to realize that neoliberalism on a world scale is not a matter of the
privatization/deregulation package in the economies of the global North trickling down
to the global South. Neoliberalism first got a political grip in the South, under the
Pinochet dictatorship in Chile. The structural adjustment programmes and the reshaping
of world finance were contemporaneous with, not later than, the neoliberal regimes of
Thatcher and Reagan. Neoliberalism seen from the South has always been about global
trade and new market-driven development strategies, quite as much as privatization and
deregulation (Connell and Dados, 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay).
The shift to trade-led development strategies has had complex implications for gender
orders. By drawing new groups of women workers into export industries, it has created
some opportunities for economic autonomy for women or at least a shift away from
breadwinner/housewife norms, also creating pressure for change in masculinities. Public
investment in women’s education, as a strategy for creating a more competitive workforce on world markets, has opened paths into higher education and professional occupations for middle-class women, though not yet in such numbers as middle-class men. Yet
the increasing reliance on market incomes, rather than redistribution via the state, generally advantages men. And corporate management is a strongly masculinized world in
which wealth and power is accumulating on an unprecedented scale, overwhelmingly in
the hands of men.
Gender politics, too, increasingly occurs in global space. Valentine Moghadam’s
Globalizing Women (2005) is an important demonstration of this, documenting three
groups of transnational feminist networks: one group concerned with structural adjustment and trade, one doing solidarity and advocacy work for women in Muslim-majority
countries, the third linking women’s groups around the Mediterranean. Here are some of
the South–South links invoked by Viveros, and necessary for the project of knowledge
creation outlined in this article.
We are still at an early stage of understanding these dynamics. We are also at an early
stage of reconstructing the sociology of gender from Southern perspectives. I think the
two tasks are connected, because only a gender analysis systematically incorporating the
experience and thought of the majority world will be powerful enough to understand
gender dynamics on a global scale. I also think this work is highly important, as the
worldwide making and unmaking of gender relations is a significant part of the most
urgent issues of our time.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or
not-for-profit sectors.
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 563
References
Acker J (2004) Gender, capitalism and globalization. Critical Sociology 30(1): 17–41.
Agarwal B (1994) A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Alatas SF (2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers) Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism.
New Delhi: Sage.
Arnfred S, Bakare-Yusuf B, Waswa Kisiang’ani E et al. (2004) African Gender Scholarship:
Concepts, Methodologies and Paradigms. Dakar: CODESRIA.
Bakare-Yusuf B (2003) ‘Yorubas don’t do gender’: A critical review of Oyeronke Oyewumi’s
The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses. African
Identities 1: 119–140.
Barbieri T de (1992) Sobre la categoría género. Una introducción teórico-metodológica. Revista
Interamericana de Sociología 6: 147–178.
Barrett M (1980) Women’s Oppression Today. London: Verso and NLB.
Bennett J (2008 – Affordable Custom Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay from Pro Writers) Editorial: Researching for life: paradigms and power. Feminist Africa 11:
1–12.
Berndt CH (1974) Digging sticks and spears, or, the two-sex model. In: Gayle F (ed.) Woman’s
Role in Aboriginal Society, 2nd edn. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, pp.
64–84.
Bhambra GK (2007) Sociology and postcolonialism: Another ‘missing’ revolution? Sociology
41(5): 871–884.
Bhaskaran S (2004) Made in India: Decolonizations, Queer Sexualities, Trans/national Projects.
New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bulbeck C (1998) Re-orienting Western Feminisms: Women’s Diversity in a Postcolonial World.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chakravarti U (2003) Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens. Calcutta: Stree.
Chodorow N (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chow EN (2003) Gender matters: Studying globalization and social change in the 21st century.
International Sociology 18(3): 443–460.
Cockburn C (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) Gender relations as causal in militarization and war: A feminist standpoint.
International Feminist Journal of Politics 12(2): 139–157.
Connell R (1995) Masculinities. Sydney: Allen and Unwin Australia.
Connell R (2007) Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science.
Cambridge: Polity.
Connell R (2011) Confronting Equality: Gender, Knowledge and Global Change. Sydney: Allen
and Unwin Australia.
Connell R and Dados N (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay) Where in the world does neoliberalism come from? The market agenda in southern perspective. Theory & Society 43(2), online at DOI: 10.1007/
s1118601492129.
Cordero T (2008 – Affordable Custom Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay from Pro Writers) Aportes investigativos del programa de posgrado maestría regional en estudios
de la mujer. Revista casa de la mujer, 2nd series, 14: 14–29.
Costa C de L (2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers) Lost (and found?) in translation: Feminisms in hemispheric dialogue. Latino
Studies 4: 62–78.
Dominguez-Ruvalcaba H and Corona I (eds) (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) Gender Violence at the U.S.–Mexico Border.
Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Dowsett GW (1996) Practicing Desire: Homosexual Sex in the Era of AIDS. Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
564 Current Sociology Monograph 2 62(4)
Elias J (2004) Fashioning Inequality: The Multinational Corporation and Gendered Employment
in a Globalizing World. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Elias J (2008 – Affordable Custom Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay from Pro Writers) Hegemonic masculinities, the multinational corporation, and the developmental
state: Constructing gender in ‘progressive’ firms. Men and Masculinities 10(4): 405–421.
Epstein D, Morrell R, Moletsane R and Unterhalter E (2004) Gender and HIV/AIDS in Africa
south of the Sahara: Interventions, activism, identities. Transformation 54: 1–16.
Gottfried H (2013) Gender, Work, and Economy: Unpacking the Global Economy. Cambridge:
Polity Press.
Harcourt W (2009) Body Politics in Development: Critical Debates in Gender and Development.
London: Zed Books.
Hountondji PJ (1997) Introduction: Recentring Africa. In: Hountondji PJ (ed.) Endogenous
Knowledge: Research Trails. Dakar: CODESRIA, pp. 1–39.
Kirkwood J (1986) Ser política en Chile: Las feministas y los partidos. Santiago: FLACSO.
Komarovsky M (1950) Functional analysis of sex roles. American Sociological Review 15: 508–
516.
Langton M (1997) Grandmothers’ law, company business and succession in changing Aboriginal
land tenure systems. In: Yunupingu G (ed.) Our Land is Our Life. St Lucia: University of
Queensland Press, pp. 84–116 .
Laurie N (2005) Establishing development orthodoxy: Negotiating masculinities in the water sector. Development and Change 36(3): 527–549.
Lewis D (2002) African gender research and postcoloniality: Legacies and challenges. Paper presented to CODESRIA Gender Institute.
Lewis D (2007) Feminism and the radical imagination. Agenda 72: 18–31.
Lugones M (2007) Heterosexism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia 22(1):
186–219.
Mama A (1997) Sheroes and villains: Conceptualizing colonial and contemporary violence against
women in Africa. In: Alexander MJ and Mohanty CT (eds) Feminist Genealogies, Colonial
Legacies, Democratic Futures. New York: Routledge, pp. 46–62 .
Mama A (2005) Gender studies for Africa’s transformation. In: Mkandawire T (ed.) African
Intellectuals: Rethinking Politics, Language, Gender and Development. Dakar: CODESRIA
Books, pp. 94–116.
Marcos S (1998) Embodied religious thought: Gender categories in Mesoamerica. Religion 28(4):
93–114.
Meekosha H (2011) Decolonizing disability: Thinking and acting globally. Disability and Society
26(6): 667–681.
Mignolo WD (2007) Delinking. Cultural Studies 21(2/3): 449–514.
Min D (2005) Awakening again: Travelling feminism in 论文帮助/论文写作服务/负担得起我及时提交我最好的质量 – China in the 1980s. Women’s Studies
International Forum 28: 274–288.
Mitchell J (1974) Psychoanalysis and Feminism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Moghadam VM (2005) Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Mohanty CT (1991) Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In:
Mohanty CT, Russo A and Torres L (eds) Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 51–80.
Mohanty CT (2003) Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Montecino S (2001) Identidades y diversidades en Chile. In: Garretón MA (ed.) Cultura y desarollo en Chile. Santiago: Andres Bello, pp. 65–98.
Montero M (2007) The political psychology of liberation: From politics to ethics and back.
Political Psychology 28(5): 517–533.
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 565
Moreton-Robinson A (2000) Talkin’ Up to the White Woman: Indigenous Women and Feminism.
St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Morrell R (2001) From Boys to Gentlemen: Settler Masculinity in Colonial Natal 1880–1920.
Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Mudimbe V (1994) The Idea of Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Nandy A (1983) The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism. New Delhi:
Oxford University Press.
Naples N and Desai M (eds) (2002) Women’s Activism and Globalization: Linking Local Struggles
and Transnational Politics. New York: Routledge.
Narayan U (1998) Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism. Hypatia 13(2): 86–106.
Odora Hoppers CA (ed.) (2002) Indigenous Knowledge and the Integration of Knowledge Systems.
Claremont, South Africa: New Africa Books.
Olavarría J (ed.) (2009) Masculinidades y globalización: Trabajo y vida privada, familias y sexualidades. Santiago: Red de Masculinidiad/es Chile, Universidad Academia de Humanismo
Cristiano and CEDEM.
Oyewumi O (1997) The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender
Discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Parsons T and Bales RF (1956) Family Socialization and Interaction Process. London: Routledge
and Kegan Paul.
Patel S (ed.) (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions. London: Sage.
Prügl E (1999) The Global Construction of Gender: Home-based Work in the Political Economy
of the 20th Century. New York: Columbia University Press.
Quijano A (2000) Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International
Sociology 15(2): 215–232.
Reuter J and Villa P-I (eds) (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) Postkoloniale Soziologie: Empirische Befunde, theoretische
Anschlüsse, politische Intervention. Bielefeld: transcript.
Richard N (2004 [1993]) Masculine/Feminine: Practices of Difference(s), trans. SR Tandeciarz
and AA Nelson. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rubin G (1975) The traffic in women: Notes on the ‘political economy’ of sex. In: Reiter RR (ed.)
Toward an Anthropology of Woman. New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 157–210.
Saffioti HIB (1978 [1969]) Women in Class Society [A mulher na sociedade de classes]. New
York: Monthly Review Press.
Saffioti HIB (2004) Gênero, patriarcado, violência. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Sardenberg CMB (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) Women’s empowerment in Brazil: Tensions in discourse and practice.
Development 53(2): 232–238.
Small Arms Survey (2011) Global Burden of Armed Violence 2011. Geneva: Graduate Institute of
International and Development Studies. Available at: www.genevadeclaration.org/measurability/global-burden-of-armed-violence/global-burden-of-armed-violence-2011.html.
Smith LT (1999) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed
Books.
Spencer H (1893–1896 [1874–1877]) The Principles of Sociology. New York: Appleton.
Stacey J and Thorne B (1985) The missing feminist revolution in sociology. Social Problems 32:
301–316.
Sumner WG (1934 [1906]) Folkways. Boston: Ginn and Company.
Tambe A (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer) Transnational feminist studies: A brief sketch. New Global Studies 4(1): article 7.
Tharu S and Niranjana T (1996) Problems for a contemporary theory of gender. In: Amin S and
Chakrabarty D (eds) Subaltern Studies, Vol. 9. Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 232–260 .
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (2009 [est.]) Escuela de Estudios de Género. Bogotá:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
566 Current Sociology Monograph 2 62(4)
Unterhalter E (2007) Gender, Schooling and Global Social Justice. London: Routledge.
Valdés T (2007) Estudios de género: una mirada evaluativa desde el Cono Sur. In: Arango LG and
Puyana Y (eds) Género, mujeres y saberes en América Latina. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional
de Colombia, pp. 47–61.
Viveros M (2007) De diferencia y diferencias. Algunos debates desde las teorías feministas y de
género. In: Arango LG and Puyana Y (eds) Género, mujeres y saberes en América Latina.
Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, pp. 175–190.
Walby S (2009) Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. London:
Sage.
Ward L (1897) Dynamic Sociology, 2nd edn. New York: Appleton.
Author biography
Raewyn Connell is University Professor at the University of Sydney, a Fellow of the Academy
of Social Sciences in Australia, and one of Australia’s leading social scientists. Her most recent
books are Confronting Equality (2011), about social science and politics; Gender: In World
Perspective (2009); and Southern Theory (2007), about social thought on a world scale. Her
other books include Masculinities, Schools and Social Justice, Ruling Class Ruling Culture,
Gender and Power and Making the Difference. Her work has been translated into 18 languages.
She has taught at universities in Australia, Write my essay for me – CA Essay writer Canada and the USA, in departments of sociology,
political science and education. A long-term participant in the labour movement and peace
movement, Raewyn has tried to make social science relevant to social justice. Details at website:
www.raewynconnell.net.
Résumé
Durant ses générations fondatrices, la sociologie s’inquiétait beaucoup du genre dans le
cadre de la théorisation du monde du colonialisme et de l’impérialisme. La sociologie
s’est ensuite concentrée sur la métropole globale, si bien que son analyse du genre dans
les décennies écoulées depuis le mouvement de libération de la femme a été développée
dans le contexte boréal. Ceci peut maintenant changer si l’extraversion de la sociologie
vers le Sud global peut être exercée. Les thématiques des analyses du genre font en
périphérie ressortir les processus historiques de la formation et de disruption de l’ordre
des genres, examinant les problèmes de violence et de territoire. Les travaux de divers
théoriciens du genre et chercheurs des pays du Sud sont discutés. Il faut que soient
reconnues les conditions matérielles de la formation du savoir dans les pays développés,
ainsi que les différentes manières utilisées par les intellectuels du Sud pour gérer les
influences de la métropole. De nouveaux problèmes ont émergé dans la sociologie du
genre avec la formation d’un ordre mondial néolibéral, produisant de nouveaux modèles
de pouvoir masculinisé et ouvrant des possibilités de changement pour les femmes.
Mots-clés
Genre, globalisation, patriarchie, postcolonial, sociologie, théorie australe
Resumen
En sus generaciones fundacionales, la sociología se preocupaba mayormente de las
cuestiones de género como parte de su teorización del mundo del colonialismo y el
imperio. Luego, la sociología se enfocó en la metrópolis global, por lo que su análisis
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
Connell 567
del género en las décadas que siguieron al movimiento de liberación femenina se ha
desarrollado dentro del Norte global. Ahora, esto puede cambiar, si se puede lograr
la extraversión de la sociología sobre el Sur global. Las temáticas de los análisis de
género en la periferia destacan los procesos históricos de formación y disrupción de
las órdenes de género, tratando temas de violencia y tierra. Se analiza el trabajo de un
número de teóricos e investigadores del género del Sur global. Deben reconocerse
las condiciones materiales de formación del conocimiento en los países en vías de
desarrollo, así como también las diversas maneras en que los intelectuales del Sur global
manejan las influencias de las metrópolis. Al delinearse un orden mundial neoliberal,
surgen nuevos temas en la sociología de género, produciendo nuevos patrones de
poder masculinizado, así como vías de cambio para las mujeres.
Palabras clave
Género, globalización, patriarcado, postcolonial, sociología, teoría austral
Downloaded from csi.sagepub.com at FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV on September 1, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
-research paper writing service

Order | Check Discount