Psychology case | Online writing help writing psychology assignment homework

Reply to the next questions in no less than  1,250 phrases. Relating to the case research under Ace homework tutors – APA format

 1. Why is that this an moral dilemma? Which Ace homework tutors – APA Moral Ideas assist body the character of the dilemma? 

2. How would possibly Irina’s age and fogeys’ involvement within the referral have an effect on how Dr. Matthews can resolve the dilemma? How would possibly the state legislation on remedy of minors and HIPAA rule on entry of guardians to a minor’s well being care file affect Dr. Matthews’ resolution?

three. How are Ace homework tutors – APA Moral Requirements 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; three.04; three.06; four.01; four.02; and 10.10a related to this case? Which different requirements would possibly apply? Use this website  http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

four.  What are Dr. Matthews’ moral options for resolving this dilemma? Which various finest displays the Ethics Code aspirational precept and enforceable commonplace, in addition to authorized requirements and Dr. Matthews’ obligations to stakeholders ? 

5. What steps ought to Dr. Matthews take to ethically implement her resolution and monitor its results 

Reference

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A sensible information for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Case 2. Cultural Values and Competent

Psychological Well being Companies to Minors

Irina, a 13-year-old lady of Arabic cultural heritage residing in Boston, Massachusetts,

was introduced by her mother and father to a hospital emergency room after an assault by a

stranger. Based mostly on her accidents, the hospital workers suspected that the attacker had

additionally sexually assaulted the lady, however she and her mother and father refused medical evaluations

for rape. The household acquired a referral to see Janet Matthews, a medical psychologist

specializing in adolescent trauma. Throughout their preliminary assembly with Dr. Matthews,

the mother and father requested the psychologist to not focus on any sexual features of the assault

with their daughter however to deal with the psychological trauma from the assault generally.

They advised the psychologist that admitting a rape had taken place would solid a

stigma on their daughter and make her ineligible to be married to males of their

carefully knit ethnic neighborhood. When requested in non-public, the lady additionally requested that

sexual points not be mentioned for a similar cause.

Moral Dilemma

Dr. Matthews doesn’t know if she ought to conform to the mother and father’ and youngster’s

request

Reply to the next questions in no less than  1,250 phrases. Relating to the case research under Ace homework tutors – APA format

 1. Why is that this an moral dilemma? Which Ace homework tutors – APA Moral Ideas assist body the character of the dilemma? 

2. How would possibly Irina’s age and fogeys’ involvement within the referral have an effect on how Dr. Matthews can resolve the dilemma? How would possibly the state legislation on remedy of minors and HIPAA rule on entry of guardians to a minor’s well being care file affect Dr. Matthews’ resolution?

three. How are Ace homework tutors – APA Moral Requirements 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; three.04; three.06; four.01; four.02; and 10.10a related to this case? Which different requirements would possibly apply? Use this website  http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

four.  What are Dr. Matthews’ moral options for resolving this dilemma? Which various finest displays the Ethics Code aspirational precept and enforceable commonplace, in addition to authorized requirements and Dr. Matthews’ obligations to stakeholders ? 

5. What steps ought to Dr. Matthews take to ethically implement her resolution and monitor its results 

Reference

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A sensible information for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Case 2. Cultural Values and Competent

Psychological Well being Companies to Minors

Irina, a 13-year-old lady of Arabic cultural heritage residing in Boston, Massachusetts,

was introduced by her mother and father to a hospital emergency room after an assault by a

stranger. Based mostly on her accidents, the hospital workers suspected that the attacker had

additionally sexually assaulted the lady, however she and her mother and father refused medical evaluations

for rape. The household acquired a referral to see Janet Matthews, a medical psychologist

specializing in adolescent trauma. Throughout their preliminary assembly with Dr. Matthews,

the mother and father requested the psychologist to not focus on any sexual features of the assault

with their daughter however to deal with the psychological trauma from the assault generally.

They advised the psychologist that admitting a rape had taken place would solid a

stigma on their daughter and make her ineligible to be married to males of their

carefully knit ethnic neighborhood. When requested in non-public, the lady additionally requested that

sexual points not be mentioned for a similar cause.

Moral Dilemma

Dr. Matthews doesn’t know if she ought to conform to the mother and father’ and youngster’s

request