Posted: December 9th, 2022

Online Discussion: What Is So Important About Academic Integrity? essay

On-Line Discussions Board Rubric
Poor Fair Good Excellent No Participation
Critical
Thinking
* Rudimentary
and superficial
* No analysis or
insight is displayed
* Generally
competent
* Information is
thin and
commonplace
* Substantial
Information
* Thought, insight,
and analysis has
taken place
* Rich in content
* Full of thought,
insight, and analysis
Connections * No connections are
made off topic
* Limited, if any
connections
* Vague generalities
* New ideas or
connections
* Lack depth
and/or detail
* Clear connections
to previous or current
to real-life situations
Original Posting * Mentions at least 2
specific points from
the article or reading
* Relation of new
information to old
information learned
in the course to date
* Relation of
information in article
or reading to
personal experience
* Discussion at a
critical level, not just
recitation of facts
from the article
Uniqueness * No new ideas
* “I agree
with…” statement
* few, if any new
ideas or connections
* Rehash or
summarize other
postings
* New ideas or
connections
* Lack depth
and/or detail
* New ideas
* New connections
* Made with
depth and detail
Relevance of
Post
* Posts topics
which do not
relate to the
discussion
content
* Makes short or
Irrelevant remarks
* Occasionally
posts off topic
* Most posts are
short in length
and offer no
further insight
into the topic
* Frequently posts
topics that are
related to
discussion
content
* Prompts further
discussion of
topic
* Consistently
posts topics
related to
discussion topic
* Best paper writer websites, Custom term paper writing service and Research papers owl essays – Professional help in research projects for students – Cite s additional
references
related to topic
On-Line Discussions Board Rubric
Poor Fair Good Excellent No Participation
Promptness
and
Initiative
* Does not respond
to most postings
* Rarely participates
freely
* Responds to most
postings several
days after initial
discussion
* Limited initiative
* Responds to most
postings within a
24 hour period
* Requires
occasional
prompting to post
* Consistently
responds to
postings in less
than 24 hours
* Demonstrates
good self-initiative
Delivery of Post * Utilizes poor
spelling and
grammar in
most posts
*Posts appear
“hasty”
* Errors in
spelling and
grammar
evidenced in
several posts
* Few
grammatical or
spelling errors
are noted in
posts
* Consistently
uses
grammatically
correct posts
with rare
misspellings
Expression
Within the Post
* Does not
express opinions
or ideas clearly
*No connection to
topic
* Unclear
connection to
topic evidenced
in minimal
expression of
opinions or
ideas
* Opinions and
ideas are stately
clearly with
occasional lack
of connection to
topic
* Expresses
opinions and
ideas in a clear
and concise
manner with
obvious
connection to
topic
On-Line Discussions Board Rubric
Poor Fair Good Excellent No Participation
Contribution to
the Forum
Learning
Community
* Does not make
effort to
participate in
learning
community as it
develops
* Seems
indifferent
* Occasionally
makes
meaningful
reflection on
group’s efforts
* Marginal effort
to become
involved with
group
* Posting responds to
the question but does
not stimulate further
class discussion
Frequently
attempts to
direct the
discussion and
to present
relevant
viewpoints for
consideration by
group
* Interacts
freely
Aware of needs
of community
*Frequently
attempts to
motivate the
group discussion
*Presents creative
approaches to
topic
* Posting fully
addresses the
module question and
stimulates at least
one substantial
follow-up
posting
On-Line Discussions Board Rubric, Criteria and Explanation
Focused on topic
Clear indication that the response is motivated by the particular reading and that the writer has taken a particular slant on that reading and
developed it.
Organization of ideas/thoughts
There is a sense in the response that ideas lead to each other and that there are connections being made.
Critical thinking evident in responses
The response is just not a summary but an attempt by the writer to push attempt by the writer to push toward a particular personal meaning.
Correlations of contributions to assigned readings
The response refers consistently to the reading and to particular ideas and situations within the reading that have made an impression.
Use of other resources/citations
The response makes connections to information, writers and other texts the writer has read or seen.
Thoughtfulness in interactions
Evidence of college level thinking that relates the writer’s life to the social.
Listening to others
The response illustrates that the writer has been paying attention to those who have interesting and provocative things to say.
Grammar/mechanics
Few grammar or sentence mechanics errors—non that interfere with the meaning the writer wants to convey.
On-Line Discussions Board Rubric, Grade Explanation
A Discussion (90-100): Excellent
Students earning an “A” for discussion activities have participated 3 or more times during the week and have posted outstanding information.
“A” discussion postings
• are made in time for others to read and respond
• deliver information that is full of thought, insight, and analysis
• make connections to previous or current content or to real-life situations
• contain rich and fully developed new ideas, connections, or applications
B Discussion (80-89): Good
Students earning a “B” for discussion activities have participated at least 2 times during the week and have posted proficient information.
“B” discussion postings
• are made in time for others to read and respond
• deliver information that shows that thought, insight, and analysis have taken place
• make connections to previous or current content or to real-life situations, but the connections are not really clear or are too obvious
• contain new ideas, connections, or applications, but they may lack depth and/or detail
C Discussion (70-79): Fair
Students earning a “C” for discussion activities have participated at least 1 time during the week and have posted basic information.
“C” discussion postings
• may not all be made in time for others to read and respond
• are generally competent, but the actual information they deliver seems thin and commonplace
• make limited, if any, connections, and those art often cast in the form of vague generalities
• contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other comments
D-F Discussion (10-69): Poor-Below Expectations
Students earning a “D-F” for discussion activities have participated at least 1 time during the week and have posted information that was below
expectations.
“D-F” discussion postings
• may not all be made in time for others to read and respond
• are rudimentary and superficial; there is no evidence of insight or analysis
• contribute no new ideas, connections, or applications
• may be completely off topic

Order | Check Discount