Posted: May 9th, 2022

Is Nuclear Energy A Safe Alternative Source of Energy

IS NUCLEAR ENERGY A SAFE ALTERNATIVE SOURCE OF ENERGY

Name
Course Number: Course Name
September 23, 2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers
Is Nuclear Energy A Safe Alternative Source of Energy
In contrast to fossil fuel, production of nuclear energy entails lower release of pollutants such as Carbon Dioxide and sulphur into the environment. This is primarily the reason why nuclear energy is termed as a clean and environmental-friendly alternative for most economies seeking to grow and maintain stable growth conditions for a longer period of time. Nuclear energy is considered safe for the environment mainly because it works actively to minimize reduction of global carbon emission and effectively becomes key in improving air quality and decrease global warming that is a direct cause of a variety of harsh climate change occurrences. Nuclear energy has minimal nuclear waste compared to fossil fuel. As such, it becomes a better and more consistent alternative for energy provision to burgeoning economies. Instituting better management and monitoring standards on nuclear production allows countries to benefit the most from its use. While nuclear energy requires a more significant economic and human costs to establish it and maintain operations when compared to others. The gains that it brings is more profitable than the initial costs incurred to install and maintain the project. One of the main reasons why nuclear energy has been dramatically adapted into most grids across the globe is because it has the potential to produce large amounts of power over a relatively small surface and this has dramatically spurred production. But more than this nuclear production needs expertise and continued cooperation between nations to ensure more considerable developments which ultimately introduces a geopolitical angle into the equations. Being an expensive source of energy generations, that if not maintained may be harmful to the environment, and inherently vulnerable to external attacks, nuclear power requires constant monitoring and accountable oversight when compared to the other forms of renewable energy. It is nonetheless the best source of energy for developing nations who need constant access to electricity at a relatively cheaper cost.
Nuclear energy has low-carbon emission. Nuclear power’s eco-friendliness comes from the fact that there is less carbon based pollution of the environment and a large amount of electricity in the end of the process. Researchers identify that “Most supporters of nuclear energy point out the low carbon emission aspect of nuclear energy as its major characteristic to be defined as renewable energy” Production of electricity and preservation of the environment are among the priorities of most governments across the world as they are vital for the long term stability, development and economic growth. For this, most governments have continually considered the amount of risk and possible advantages nuclear energy could have on the environment and in so doing considered its impact as a whole. This has been so evident in the Asian region’s economic growth but still its impacts within the environment in the long term remain a mystery for most people in the public who benefit the most from it and stand to be affected the most by its failure.
The energy source protects air quality. With limited carbon emission and high standards of use in place, the potential for damages brought about through used of nuclear energy remain to be far little compared to the benefits that the use of nuclear energy would bring. Air quality for instance ios one of the most positive aspect that can be recorded from the use of nuclear energy. As such it is important to look into past tragedies and learn from them in order to create a competent structural framework that is empirically cost effective. The Fukushima reactor meltdown and the Chernobyl incidents in Japan and Ukraine respectively remain to enhance this perspective of better management for maximum profitability in use of nuclear energy. Dismissing nuclear energy as potential harm for the ecosystem will slow down growth and paralyze majority of the growth achieved within the developing and already developed Asian regions. This is because, of all current renewable energies none is more consistent, reliable and the least affected by external elements other than nuclear energy. Researchers identify that “There are six key issues in regard to the use of nuclear energy according to the energy committee. These are: safety, nuclear waste, economic competitiveness, life-cycle analysis, fuel-availability, and non-proliferation.” Creating protocols aimed at safeguarding its installation and use will work better to ensure its users across the world face limited risk and maximum benefits form its adoption. Nuclear is a very important in quelling the ever persisting threat presented by limited availability of energy resources to human society central to their social, economic, political and cultural development and organization. As such, creation of safe developmental structures and policies on nuclear use would be a great way to avoid catastrophic losses.
There is minimal waste obtained from nuclear energy. Nuclear energy waste require consistently monitoring, good storage and regularly appraisal for seepage resulting in more avenues for cost incurrence. Nuclear power plants are all the same still considered “green” energy technology. This is based on the fact that they produce little waste compared to other alternative. Still the term “green” has worked for most proponents of nuclear as it has brought about an increase in nuclear power plants construction across the world. In Asia specifically, nuclear uptake has been a good reason as to why most of the regions development has been fast tracked as it has brought down production related costs and increased investment . But still it remains a relatively risky proposition that in the end, remains unresolved with regard to its health. Nuclear plants waste remains active for thousands of years, and this makes it hard to dispose of presenting new threats to the environment. Researchers identify that “That waste can also be reprocessed and recycled, although the United States does not currently do this.” While people think that nuclear energy waste are produced in vast amounts, the true amount is low and require great efforts to maintain. While most countries that use nuclear energy have generally benefited from the technology, most countries in the developed world still find it hard to transition to what seems to be the better alternative and get rid of fossil fuel. This primarily lies in the fact that initial investment costs of setting up nuclear energy grid and waste management is high. Nuclear power plants are costly and to build and maintain considering there is a vast variety of alternatives ready for development with virtually near zero relative investment costs.
One major limitation on the use of nuclear power is that the energy is finite and countries cannot be self-reliant, especially developing nations. This is because wealthier countries impose bans and embargos on developing nations trying to acquire nuclear energy since they apply the same amount of technology when developing nuclear power as the one they use in developing nuclear weapons. The primary resource in use of nuclear, Uranium is usually limited in supply across the global market as it is a finite natural resource that requires importation. Researchers identify that “Uranium is a weakly radioactive element found in the Earth’s crust.” This results in decreased world cohesion and increased tension across the world. Additionally, emerging nations lose revenue to more prosperous nations to build nuclear power, perpetually ensuring continuity in poverty . According to researchers, several countries across the globe have additionally used the vague cover of nuclear power development as a guide in the development of nuclear weapons
While nuclear power is high and sustainable for the long term, its limitation out the way its benefits considering that there is a better alternative with similar costs and nearly zero irreversible consequences on ecosystem exposed to it. Nuclear power is vulnerable to terrorists, and world peace since its failure or development could lead to weapons or disastrous environmental damages. Additionally, nuclear development is costlier than other renewable energy such as the wind or sun, since it will need constant human costs and lifetime maintenance of its byproducts.

Help write my assignment – Bibliography
Chowdhury, Navid. Is nuclear energy renewable energy? 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap.
http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap/ph241/chowdhury2/
Grandin, Karl, Peter Jagers, and Sven Kullander. “Nuclear Energy.” Ambio 39, 2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer, 26-30.
Rhodes, Richard. Why nuclear power must be part of the energy solution. 2018: 2024 – Write My Essay For Me | Essay Writing Service For Your Papers Online.
https://e360.yale.edu/features/why-nuclear-power-must-be-part-of-the-energy-solution- environmentalists-climate.
U.S. Department of Energy. 3 reasons why nuclear is clean and sustainable. 2020.
https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/3-reasons-why-nuclear-clean-and-sustainable
Tsoukalas, Lefteri H., Rong Gao, And Eugene D. Coyle. “A Future Role For Nuclear Energy?” In Understanding The Global Energy Crisis, Edited By Coyle Eugene D. And Simmons Richard A., 167-90. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press, 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay.

Order | Check Discount