Professional Writers
We assemble our team by selectively choosing highly skilled writers, each boasting specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and a robust background in academic writing
Order For Similar Custom Papers & Assignment Help Services
Fill the order form details - writing instructions guides, and get your paper done.
Posted: May 13th, 2018
guestion 2
Question description
Background to the QuestionAs I believe we have already noted
previously, that United States Constitution was adopted at a time when
government itself was seen as a problem – a threat to individual
liberty. Hence the United States Constitution was written as, and
largely remains, a marginal safeguard system against hasty majority
action. Under its separation of powers system, the President is elected
by a different system, for a different term, and by a different
electorate than either of the houses in the Legislature. The Congress
itself is divided into two houses, each of which is also elected by a
different electorate (state-wide versus Congressional district) and for a
different term. Originally the Senate (chosen by state legislatures,
not direct election) was also elected by a different system than the
House. And, of course, there are also the federal courts, each of which
can declare unconstitutional laws passed by the Congress or state
legislatures, and decisions of state courts. And judges hold their
position for lifeAdd to this the federal system which divides the
totality of government power between the states and the federal
government, the checks and balance system designed to preserve the
essence of the separation of powers system, and the Bill of Rights and
its application to the states via the 14th Amendment, and you have a system well designed to protect the people from the Government.By
contrast, the British political system is unitary and parliamentary.
There is no federal division of power and the legislative and executive
branches are fused together in the Parliament to make policy making
easier. There is a Bill of Rights, but every part of it can be rescinded
by a simple parliamentary majority. In fact, before the United Kingdom
joined the European Community, and subjected itself to the supremacy of
the EC in a very narrow area of policy making, there was nothing that
Parliament could not legally do. More precisely, there was nothing that a
majority in the House of Commons could not do, because the House of
Lords for most of the 20th century could only delay the passage of legislation, not prevent it.The Question:Should the British people be (more) worried about their rights being violated than Americans? If not, why not? If so, why?You may refer to whatever sources your choose in answering.
Why choose us
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Discounted Prices
Our service is committed to delivering the finest writers at the most competitive rates, ensuring that affordability is balanced with uncompromising quality. Our pricing strategy is designed to be both fair and reasonable, standing out favorably against other writing services in the market.
AI & Plagiarism-Free
Rest assured, you'll never receive a product tainted by plagiarism or AI-generated content. Each paper is research-written by human writers, followed by a rigorous scanning process of the final draft before it's delivered to you, ensuring the content is entirely original and maintaining our unwavering commitment to providing plagiarism-free work.
How it works
When you decide to place an order with Nurscola, here is what happens: