Comprehensive examination prep | Online writing help writing psychology assignment homework

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

1. What’s the objective of the great examination? 

The great examination is designed to evaluate the diploma to which you’ve got met your program targets and learner outcomes.

2. What assets can be found to assist me put together for my complete examination?

• Complete examination information
• Program outcomes
• Course supplies

three. What can I do to organize for my complete examination? 

• Overview the great examination information.
• Overview program outcomes.
• Overview your course supplies.
• Entry the web complete examination toolbox.
• Learn and evaluate examples of questions posted on the web complete examination course.

four. When do I take my complete examination? 

You need to work together with your division chair or designee to speak  your intention to take the great examination within the time period in  which you’re enrolled within the final course or programs required in your  program of research.

5. How do I take the great examination? 

You’ll be hooked up to the web complete examination course  throughout he time period wherein you’re scheduled to take your complete  examination. The examination questions are made accessible to college students  inside the on-line complete examination course on the day the examination  is scheduled to start. You should have one week to develop your responses  and submit your work to the examination submissions space of the course.

6. What’s the easiest way for me to organize for the great examination? 

You need to start getting ready for the examination out of your very first course  in this system. Define important materials as you progress by every  course in order that it is possible for you to to attract from this when getting ready for the  precise examination.

7. How lengthy do most college students take to review for and put together for his or her complete examination?

This can be a worth judgment to be selected by every scholar. Preserve in  thoughts that you’re getting ready for the examination throughout each course you absorb  this system. The examination is run electronically and is open ebook  and open observe, so retaining your course supplies, including to your  outlines, or retaining a course-by-course journal will expedite the  preparation course of. 

eight. Do I’ve to make use of Ace homework tutors – APA format in my complete examination? 

Sure, the expectation is that you’ll observe Ace homework tutors – APA pointers as you full the great examination.

9. How necessary are right grammar and spelling in my complete examination? 

Right spelling and grammar are anticipated always from all college students.

10.  Are the readers of my complete examination anticipating me to know the entire theories related to my focus? 

The readers anticipate you to exhibit a radical information of all related theories as studied all through your programs.

11. If English isn’t my main language, could I’ve an editor evaluate my responses and make options? 

Graduate college students are anticipated to finish the great  examination with out the help of an editor or different people.  Impartial work is anticipated of all college students in finishing the  complete examination.

12. Will there be anybody accessible whereas I’m taking my complete examination to reply questions that I may need?

Chances are you’ll handle questions associated to accessing the great examination toolbox to your program chair or designee.

13. How are my responses assessed? 

Two school members will learn and assess your work.  Your responses  shall be scored in opposition to program-specific studying outcomes and in  accordance with graduate degree expectations of efficiency.

14. How am I notified of the outcomes?

Your division chair or designee will publish your examination ends in the  course and/or e-mail the outcomes to you by the ultimate day of the time period.

15. How lengthy do I’ve to attend for the outcomes? 

You’ll be notified of your outcomes previous to the top of the session wherein you are taking the great examination.

16. What occurs if I don’t move? 

You may have two extra alternatives to efficiently full the  examination if you don’t move the primary time.  See the Complete  Examination Information for added particulars.

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

I need help writing my essay – research paper observe that the next vignettes characterize  samples of the sorts of questions you may be requested to answer on the  complete examination. You’ll NOT obtain these questions on the  complete examination; they’re for research functions solely.

I need help writing my essay – research paper compose a well-written and arranged essay in response to every  of the next questions. When writing your essays, please

1. Use Ace homework tutors – APA (sixth version) Type, with 1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12 font, .
2. Ace my homework – Write clearly and concisely.
3. Cite applicable, and particularly present, literature (empirical and/or theoretical).
4. Keep away from all sexist idioms and allusions.
5. Keep in mind to exhibit your multicultural competence the place applicable.

Vignette: Make the most of this state of affairs for your entire responses

A 42-year-old African American lady was dropped at the emergency  room by law enforcement officials for analysis previous to going to jail to await  disposition. She reported that she had been procuring when “one thing  occurred.” She stated that she had no recollection of occasions between the  time she entered the shop and an hour later, when she was arrested for  shoplifting in a close-by division retailer with a substantial quantity of  stolen property on her particular person. She protested her innocence and have become so  agitated, belligerent, and profane that the arresting officers took her  to the hospital for analysis. On the hospital she reported that two  years beforehand she had been arrested for shoplifting and had had  amnesia for the act. 

The fees in opposition to her have been then dropped as a result of  she defined that each the shoplifting and the amnesia resulted from  her forgetting to eat after taking her insulin. Of observe, her blood-sugar  degree on testing within the emergency room was elevated.

The affected person calmed down showing asymptomatic after the analysis  and was transferred to jail pending a preliminary listening to. 

When she  discovered that her launch was deliberate for the following day and that the  fees in opposition to her wouldn’t be dropped, she grew to become extraordinarily agitated,  indignant, and abusive to the officers. Shortly thereafter, she complained  of a headache and stated she had no recollection of her abusive conduct.  Later that night she accosted an officer angrily. When the officer  responded and addressed the affected person by title, “Naomi,” the affected person stated  that her title was “Oprah” and that she wouldn’t permit herself to be  known as “Naomi,” whom she described as a “wimp and a loser.”

“Oprah’s” voice and motion have been considerably totally different from these of  “Naomi.” She claimed that she had achieved the shoplifting and stepped again  in order that “Naomi” could possibly be caught and humiliated, and that if she had  wished to, she may have evaded detection simply. She was returned to  the ER and subsequently admitted to the inpatient psychiatric unit for  commentary. 

For the following two days, the affected person had many obvious  switches of character, accompanied by conspicuous adjustments in costume,  make-up, and demeanor. On a number of events “Oprah” was disruptive, and  twice “Naomi” reported to nurses that she had discovered issues belonging to  different sufferers in her possession.

There have been no constant variations in blood-sugar ranges within the  totally different personalities or adjustments on the time of the shifts. A  neurological workup with intensive electroencephalographic research  proved unremarkable. The affected person started to complain that her conduct was  out of her management and that she couldn’t be held accountable for it.  Every day’s progress notes revealed additional particulars of the variations  between “Oprah” and “Naomi.”

A counselor was requested to see the affected person. He noticed the presence of  each “Oprah” and “Naomi” and documented their polarized and clear-cut  variations. The personalities have been detailed and elaborate as they  mentioned points regarding the affected person’s present authorized difficulties.  He discovered that the affected person had an in depth historical past of discrepant  behaviors that she had “forgotten,” to which many witnesses would  attest, and that her household typically remarked that she was “like two  totally different folks.”

 He discovered that these episodes had often occurred  when the affected person had engaged in conduct that introduced adversarial private  penalties upon her. He famous that the affected person was on a unit that, by  coincidence, had three different sufferers with comparable symptomology and  that, starting the day the affected person discovered that the costs in opposition to her  wouldn’t be dropped, she had begun to affiliate extra continuously with  these sufferers.

An in depth historical past, taken over a number of days, and ancillary sources  did not reveal any historical past of childhood abuse and there was no  indication that the affected person had skilled every other overwhelming  traumatic occasions. 

Moreover, the historical past indicated that the affected person,  regardless of the apparently basic nature of her two personalities, had  by no means proven or complained of every other vital psychological  symptomology. Her historical past contains having been raised as an solely baby  in a middle-class city surroundings by her mom and grandmother. 

She  reviews that she has an excellent relationship with all members of her household  though she has a extra distant relationship along with her father, who works  lengthy hours as an engineer. His mom and grandmother work as academics  in close by non-public faculties. Each her mother and father are of Haitian descent  although the affected person was born and has lived her total life within the United  States.

The affected person’s developmental historical past contains having met all bodily  and cognitive developmental milestones on time, with gentle difficulties  in studying and peer relationships. In early elementary college she was  reported to have had some ‘appearing out’ issues together with hitting  one other baby, and speaking again to adults, nonetheless, these behaviors have been  not extreme or long-term sufficient to warrant suspension or ongoing  concern. In highschool, no conduct issues have been famous, and she or he was  described as socially considerably reclusive, having just one or two shut  pals.

Prior hospital data have been discovered for “Naomi” indicating an extended  historical past of alcohol, heroin, and cocaine use, however upon confrontation  about this historical past she claimed to have been clear for 3 weeks prior  to her arrest. Her preliminary blood work was constructive for each opiods and  hashish.

The counselor additionally famous that the “Naomi” he was interviewing was  considerably totally different from the “Naomi” with whom her household and pals  have been acquainted. The same old “Naomi” was nice and mild-mannered except  “crossed,” at which occasions she grew to become indignant and belligerent. He additionally  discovered that the affected person was not very hypnotizable. 

He undertook a  extended interview wherein he lined a variety of subjects over  a number of hours. Because the interview proceeded, “Oprah,” who was fully  constant in her presentation throughout her dialogue of issues associated  to the shoplifting and disruptive occasions on the ward, started to turn into  inconsistent in her voice and method. She complained that the guide  disbelieved her and was making an attempt to “trick” her. 

As “Oprah” appeared unable  to take care of her presentation, “Namoi” vehemently reproached the  guide for doubting the account provided by “Oprah,” for whose previous  behaviors and present interactions with the guide she had  constantly maintained she had amnesia. At these indignant moments, her  conduct was indistinguishable from “Oprah’s.” After one other hour’s  interviewing, throughout which the affected person made a number of efforts to persuade  the guide that she had amnesia in the course of the store lifting episode, she  ceased to show the amnesiac behaviors.

When she was launched to her public defender who informed her she would  be arraigned the next day, she flew right into a rage and threatened  that she would slash her wrists with the primary sharp object she may  discover. She additionally claimed that she was listening to voices in her head telling  her to kill herself.

Primarily based on the vignette supplied, please compose a well-written  and arranged response to every of the next questions.  When  writing your responses, please:

• Use Ace homework tutors – APA (sixth version) Type, with 1-inch margins, double-spaced, 12 font, with a reference record on the finish.
• Ace my homework – Write clearly and concisely.
• Cite applicable, and particularly present, literature (empirical and/or theoretical).
• Keep away from all sexist idioms and allusions.
• Keep in mind to exhibit your multicultural competence the place applicable. 

Psychological Principle and Observe

1. What assessments would you conduct to reinforce your understanding of  the issues of the particular person within the vignette and the way would your alternative of  evaluation(s) inform your diagnostic formation and therapy planning?  Assessments could embody structured or unstructured interviews, legitimate and  dependable evaluation measures, and/or formalized evaluation procedures  that could be carried out by your self or by another person referred by you. 
2. Present your diagnostic impressions (primarily based on the DSM-5) for this  particular person. In narrative type, please describe how the person meets  the diagnostic standards for the dysfunction(s) chosen along with the  differential diagnostic thought course of that you just used to succeed in your  hypotheses. Make sure you embody any extra (lacking) data that  is required to both rule out or affirm your differential diagnoses  impressions.

Authorized Principle and Utility

1.  Clarify the background, present presentation, and conduct of the  particular person within the vignette using organic, studying, and social  theories on offenders to help your place. Don’t merely restate  the background data from the vignette. As an alternative, present a  theoretically-based dialogue to know the prison behaviors of  the particular person within the vignette.
2. Take into account the kind of crime within the vignette and focus on how that sort  of crime usually impacts a sufferer of it.  Don’t restrict your self to  discussing simply the sufferer on this vignette.  As an alternative receive scholarly  sources for data on how one of these crime can have an effect on any sufferer,  their members of the family, and different members of society. 
3. Describe the psycholegal requirements and/or definitions for every of  the next: competence to face trial, responsibility to warn, and madness.  Establish and describe a number of landmark case(s) for every normal (at  least three circumstances whole). Describe the weather or points psychological  well being skilled often focuses on when assessing an individual’s  adjudicative competence, danger and madness, and any extra objects  that may be particularly necessary to concentrate on within the supplied vignette.

Evaluation, Analysis and Analysis

1. Describe checks or evaluation procedures you’ll make use of to deal with  the psycholegal problems with (competence to face trial, danger of  dangerousness, and madness). Chances are you’ll refer to those from the  Psychological Principle and Evaluation Part “A” in the event you already lined  them there.  Talk about what the anticipated conclusions could be primarily based  upon data supplied within the vignette.
2. Develop a analysis query and a testable analysis speculation  concerning offenders or the kind of crime that’s mentioned within the  vignette (resembling, habit, recidivism, prison conduct, and so on.).   Clarify the variables in your query and the kind of analysis research  that might reply your query in addition to why that analysis would make a  contribution to the sphere of forensic psychology.

Management, Session, and Ethics

1. What are the moral and authorized dilemmas this vignette launched?  What could be your rapid steps and why? I need help writing my essay – research paper be particular and make  certain that you just describe your strategy of moral choice making and the  options/penalties to which this course of would possibly lead. Your dialogue  needs to be knowledgeable by the American Psychological Affiliation’s Ethics  Code in addition to the Specialty Tips for Forensic Psychologists.

Interpersonal Effectiveness

1. What variety components, cultural concerns, or different  demographic variables pertaining to the particular person within the vignette would you  take note of in rendering diagnoses, selecting evaluation measures,  forming case conceptualizations, and designing the therapy plan?  Be  certain to debate cultural/variety components that might apply even when they  usually are not explicitly talked about within the vignette.
2. Your writing, use of citations, potential to type a logical argument,  and correct Ace homework tutors – APA Type, together with the usage of paraphrasing, shall be  evaluated as a measure of your interpersonal effectiveness. No response  is required for “B”.

Ace homework tutors – APA Format

Written Project Requirements

All written assignments submitted are anticipated to be of the very best  caliber and in keeping with high quality skilled requirements and may  exhibit mastery of normal American English. The  university-approved version of the Publication Guide of the American  Psychological Affiliation have to be adopted. The guide supplies express  directions on tips on how to construction work, assemble references, create  headings, current concepts, generate tables, report numbers and statistics  appropriately, and extra. The guide organizes all written work merchandise and  all college students should strictly adhere to Ace homework tutors – APA model, format, and  group.

Ace homework tutors – APA Assets

The next reference supplies on model and format are revealed by the American Psychology Affiliation ( http://www.apastyle.org/):

Ace homework tutors – APA Publications Net Website

http://www.apa.org/pubs/index.aspx

Ace homework tutors – APA Guide & Associated Assets

http://www.apastyle.org/pubmanual.html

Ace homework tutors – APA Type Helper (Digital)

http://www.apastyle.org/elecref.html

 ( if listed here are the Instructors closing scores, feedback from the primary examination taken by the earlier tutor)!!!

MA FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY COMPREHENSIVE EXAM 

STUDENT ID:  Pupil A 

Fall A 2017 

PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE:  ASSESSMENT (A) 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar demonstrates inadequate information of how the evaluation  course of may be utilized to reinforce understanding of the shopper’s  presenting issues, in addition to aiding in formulating diagnostic  impressions and a therapy plan.  The scholar states that he/she would  conduct “character evaluation, household relationship evaluation and  psychological well being evaluation to investigate the issues of the Abby” however does  not element any particular evaluation devices that may be really helpful  (aside from a structured interview).  There may be additionally no point out of  particular psychological well being points that may be addressed in evaluation  (e.g. mental functioning, suicidality, homicidality, psychosis,  sociopathy).  There are statements on this part that replicate an absence  of familiarity with and accuracy of understanding the evaluation  course of, e.g. dialogue of psychiatrists reasonably than psychologists  conducting diagnostic testing and the assertion that evaluation outcomes  improve affected person confidence and make them extra conscious of their very own  capability.  Lastly, this part is poorly written grammatically, making  it considerably tough to observe the coed’s communications.   

PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE:  DIAGNOSTIC IMPRESSIONS (B) 

Grade:  Rising (2) 

The  scholar lists Obsessive Compulsive Dysfunction and Schizophrenia Spectrum  Dysfunction as doable diagnoses, however the scholar’s supplied record of  diagnostic standards isn’t matched to those diagnoses.  One of many  standards listed within the DSM-5 for a analysis of OCD is that the  disturbance isn’t higher defined by the signs of one other psychological  dysfunction.  On this case, Trichotillomania (Hair Pulling Dysfunction) would  extra exactly describe the shopper’s presenting signs.  The scholar  identifies some particular issues inside the broad class of  Schizophrenia Spectrum Problems (e.g. Delusional Dysfunction,  Schizoaffective Dysfunction, “Character Dysfunction”, and Schizophrenia),  however doesn’t point out why one in every of these diagnoses would possibly higher match the  presenting information than one other.          

The scholar does  not embody any dialogue of whether or not the shopper’s signs would possibly benefit a  analysis inside the class of Disruptive, Impulse Management and  Conduct Problems.  Moreover, there isn’t any point out of whether or not Bulemia  Nervosa and Pyromania may be listed as provisional (rule out)  diagnoses meriting additional investigation, alongside 

with  consideration of doable natural components, publicity to trauma and  doable mental disabilities.  Lastly, the coed mentions that  the shopper’s degree of openness needs to be thought of in formulating a  analysis, however doesn’t elaborate on this level or supply different  particular person/cultural components which may be thought of.    

Total, this part doesn’t characterize a proficient understanding of the diagnostic course of.    

LEGAL THEORY AND APPLICATION:  THEORETICAL FORMULATION 

Grade:  Rising (2) 

The  key process on this part is to conceptualize the shopper using a  particular theoretical framework.  The scholar supplies an outline of  social, organic and studying theories, however doesn’t appear to  perceive the which means of those theories and doesn’t hyperlink them in any respect  to precise occasions within the shopper’s historical past/presentation which can clarify  her signs, resembling being pregnant and start issues, developmental  delay, sexual trauma by father and brothers, and so on.  Additional, the coed  doesn’t sufficiently handle the subject of sufferer/offender psychology,  as there may be a lot on this shopper’s historical past which means that her  historical past of trauma (organic and psychological) could have contributed to  her forensic presentation. In conclusion, the coed doesn’t  sufficiently grasp the aim of a theoretical formulation as a way  of understanding the shopper’s conduct and their alleged crime.     

LEGAL THEORY:  DESCRIPTION OF CRIME 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar describes the crime within the current case as arson.  Whereas this  is a element of the crime, it could be necessary to notice that the  shopper was charged with tried homicide of her brother by arson.   Moreover, life imprisonment isn’t essentially the penalty for arson.  Moreover, if convicted, this shopper could be convicted of tried  homicide, not simply of arson.  The scholar gives one scholarly quotation  discussing the final influence of arson on its victims.   

LEGAL THEORY AND APPLICATION:  LEGAL IMPLICATIONS 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar supplies a adequate description of the authorized definition of  Competency to Stand Trial, however doesn’t present a selected authorized  normal/landmark case precedent related to this normal, focusing  incorrectly as a substitute on the forensic psychologist’s analysis of the  affected person going through trial.   

The scholar’s description of the  idea of Responsibility to Warn is poorly written, with confusion about  references to therapist, shopper, and sufferer.  It isn’t correct that  clinicians fail to warn out of concern of being discovered liable underneath Responsibility to  Warn; actually, legal responsibility would extra possible come up out of a failure to  warn an identifiable sufferer.  Once more, the coed supplies no landmark  circumstances on this space, misunderstanding the idea of a landmark case  precedent.   

The scholar’s description of the idea of  Madness can be poorly written, with references to “irregular”  conduct…violation of neighborhood norms, …and dangerousness.”  This  definition isn’t correct and likewise doesn’t reference the necessary  level that the madness protection pertains to the defendant’s psychological state  on the time of the fee of the crime.  The scholar cites a case  the place a defendant was discovered to have feigned madness, reasonably than a case  the place a defendant was discovered to be criminally insane on the time of the  fee of the crime.    

This part is poorly written and demonstrates an unacceptable degree of understanding of the three key authorized ideas. 

RESEARCH AND EVALUATION:  FORENSIC EVALUATION   

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar mentioned no particular devices which may be used to  handle the forensic questions on this case.  In truth, the coed appears  to not perceive the concept of how particular evaluation devices would possibly  be used to find out the shopper’s psycho-legal standing.  The scholar  mentions in search of a affected person historical past, which is legitimate, however focuses on  potential information resembling interviewing law enforcement officials and individuals who have  interacted socially along with her, reasonably than precise police/courtroom data  and data from her prolonged psychological well being settings and companies.  

Whereas  evaluating context is at all times helpful, and evaluation of the affected person’s  present state of arousal could supply clues, there isn’t any point out of  standardized measures to evaluate the shopper’s doable madness on the  time of the crime, danger of hazard to self/others and competency to face  trial. 

Lastly, reasonably than rendering a judgment as to  whether or not the shopper meets the three psycho-legal requirements, the coed  states that the shopper could also be affected by a “character and psychological  well being dysfunction” resembling OCD, which the coed gives as an evidence  for the conduct which led to the alleged crime of tried homicide by  arson.       

Total, there isn’t any significant linkage of  scientific information with authorized requirements to deal with the related forensic  questions on this part.  

RESEARCH AND EVALUATION: RESEARCH PROPOSAL 

Grade:  Rising (2)  

The scholar begins by proposing the next analysis query:   

“What are the consequences of character facet of Abby to her prison conduct?”   

Not  solely is that this assertion poorly written grammatically, it focuses on  researching the shopper reasonably than a broader pattern of individuals charged  with the same crime.  The scholar appropriately states that character  components could be the impartial variable on this research and prison  conduct could be the dependent variable.  

The scholar states  survey technique could be used, however doesn’t state who could be surveyed,  what devices may be used, what particular elements of character  could be addressed, and so on.  The potential contribution of this proposed  research could be very generic, reasonably than providing one thing extra particular like  figuring out predictive components that may contribute to prevention of  such conduct. 

The scholar doesn’t specific a transparent  understanding of the worth of analysis methodology in contributing to an  understanding of prison conduct on this part.  

LEADERSHIP, CONSULTATION AND ETHICS:  ETHICAL ISSUES 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar erroneously states that the moral/authorized dilemma is the  current case is whether or not the shopper is a candidate for a neighborhood  useful resource program.  That is the referral query, not an moral/authorized  dilemma. The scholar shows additional confusion about moral/authorized  dilemmas by stating that the shopper’s potential conflicting points or  skilled duties needs to be explored, reasonably than addressing these  points concerning the clinician. As the coed continues to element a  step-by-step plan, there isn’t any point out of any precise moral/authorized  dilemmas within the current case.  Additional, the coed fails to determine  any particular necessary moral concerns, in keeping with the Ace homework tutors – APA  Ethics Code and SGFP, resembling knowledgeable consent, steps to make sure privateness  and confidentiality, avoidance of hurt and steps that may be taken if  the shopper reveals present danger of hurt to self or others.  It ought to  even be famous that the courtroom is the “shopper” on this case.  Subsequently,  the shopper have to be knowledgeable that he’s not entitled to confidentiality  with respect to the courtroom, although his file is in any other case confidential  with respect to outdoors events. It could even be helpful to voice  warning about serving in a possible A number of Relationship, if serving  concurrently in each an evaluation/referral function to the courtroom and a  therapy function.  

INTER-PERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS: DIVERSITY AND MULTICULTURAL COMPETENCE 

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  scholar begins this part by stating that sexual orientation, SES and  bodily incapacity are the related variety components that may be a  focus on this case.  That is curious as there isn’t any point out of the  shopper’s sexual orientation or of her being sexually lively and there may be  no point out of the shopper having a bodily incapacity.  The scholar 

in any other case  solely mentions tradition and historic context in a normal approach as  necessary, however gives no particular elements of the shopper’s identification that  could also be necessary to think about in assessing, diagnosing, conceptualizing  or treating this affected person.  There isn’t a point out of key salient cultural  components which have been recognized on this case resembling  mental/developmental functioning, household constellation, trauma  historical past,  

age, weight problems and different medical considerations and psychiatric standing.    

It  could be very unclear why the coed provided the next extra  assertion concerning variety:  “Nevertheless, the facet of globalization  has facilitated multiculturalism thus making it onerous for the  psychiatrists to find out the cultural competence of the sufferers  (Hays, 2016: 2024 – Do my homework – Help write my assignment online).”  

Lastly, there was additionally no dialogue  of particular areas of competence which the assessing or treating  clinician ought to possess so as to work inside the boundaries of their  competence and to serve the shopper successfully.  Likewise, areas of  cultural similarity or distinction between therapist and shopper would  even be necessary to think about.   

INTER-PERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS:  WRITING IN Ace homework tutors – APA STYLE  

Grade:  Unacceptable (1) 

The  high quality of the coed’s writing and expression of concepts could be very poor  all through the paper and isn’t in any respect in keeping with graduate college  scholarship.  There are citations supplied within the paper and listed in  the reference record, although quotations didn’t embody web page numbers in  the quotation per Ace homework tutors – APA pointers.   

Whole Factors:   13/40 FAIL