Posted: December 31st, 2020

Casino Gambling Industry, Coach case analysis

Question description

just use your own word to answer each questions. no references, no other people’s idea. Written Case Analysis (15X4=60 Points) You are required to submit FOUR individual case analysis of up to three pages (Times New Roman, 12 point, single spaced) on the following 4 cases: Madonna, Casino Gambling Industry; Coach; & Nucor. Please note that Madonna & Casino Gambling Industry cases are not in the Text, and .pdf copies of these cases will be posted on to Canvas. Questions for each case will also be posted on to Canvas. The written case analysis is due on the day the case is scheduled for discussion in the class in the form of print copy (Please make sure to print out the case write-up and bring it to the class and it will be collected from you at the end of the class). Also please upload an electronic copy on to Canvas (through the Assignment link) before class begins. Please note that this document will be processed by turnitin. com to detect possible plagiarism and review originality. A write-up not submitted according to the procedures and format prescribed above will not be accepted. Academic Integrity & Plagiarism in Case Write-ups Plagiarism, especially from the internet or websites, or from previous class submissions, and from any other source is UNACCEPTABLE and will be dealt severely with under the University’s policy on academic dishonesty. The written case assignment is to be prepared on an individual basis and it is expected that the content of your written case reflects YOUR thoughts and analysis rather than the work of others. One of the criteria applied for ~ Hire our professional writers now and experience the best assignment help online with our custom paper writing service. We ensure your essays and assignments are expertly researched, written and delivered on time. ~ Grading the quality and originality of written case analysis is as follows: 1. Evidence of ability to size-up the organization’s situation and to identify key problems/issues. 2. Use of appropriate analytical techniques, sound logic, and well-supported arguments in evaluating the organization’s present condition and future prospects. 3. Evidence of ability to formulate realistic and workable recommendations for action.4. Thoroughness — both (a) scope and coverage and (b) depth of analysis. 5. Evidence of ability to use good communication skills. 6. Evidence of adequate preparation, pride of workmanship, and display of professional attitude and approach. 5 Papers which, in the opinion of the instructor, employ disproportionately poor grammar and poor quality written communication skills will receive up to a two letter grade reduction.

Order | Check Discount