Posted: September 10th, 2023

BM6024 Organisational Strategy

BM6024
Organisational Strategy
(20 credits)

Student Module Handbook
2018: 2024 – Write My Essay For Me | Essay Writing Service For Your Papers Online-19 October intake

Introduction
Welcome to Organisational Strategy (BM6024)! This is a level 6 core 20-credit module in Business & Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment Top-Up Programme in partnership with Bath Business School.
Programme of Learning
Self-directed study:

This is a 20-credit module and students are expected to spend roughly 200 hours on the module. This involves 2 hours contact time per week. This is likely to include reading, assessment preparation, group work etc. Some direction will be provided each week on what to use this time for.

Assessment and submission dates:
S1: Individual Business Report
(2000 word max)
Via Turnitin
Monday 21.01.2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers before 10 am
40 % weighting

25% weighting
S1: Group Presentations In Class
Via Turnitin from w/c 01/04/2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers and w/c 08/04/2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers
S 2: Time Limited Assignment Via Turnitin
Case study released: Monday 03 June 2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers at 10 am
Submission deadline: Monday 10th June 2019: 2024 – Online Assignment Homework Writing Help Service By Expert Research Writers) before 10 am

35% weighting

Group Strategic Assessment (65%)

Students will carry out a strategic analysis at business and sector level. The strategic position of business units will be assessed followed by an evaluation of strategic fit and direction at the conglomerate level. Individual marks will be awarded for both parts.
Students will produce an individual business report (40%) analysing the strategic position of an individual business. This report must assess the strategic positioning of the business in relation to both external and internal factors. This will draw on the concepts and methods developed in the first part of the course.
Use PESTLE and SWOT analysis tools and also use Porter’s Five Forces Framework five forces:
• the threat of entry
• the threat of substitutes
• the bargaining power of buyers
• the bargaining power of suppliers and
• the extent of rivalry between competitors.
Use also , Strategic group analysis;
• Understanding competition – enables focus on direct competitors within a strategic group, rather than the whole industry. (E.g. Tesco will focus on Sainsburys and Asda.)
• Analysis of strategic opportunities – helps identify attractive ‘strategic spaces’ within an industry.
• Analysis of ‘mobility barriers’ – i.e. obstacles to movement from one strategic group to another. These barriers can be overcome to enter more attractive groups. Barriers can be built to defend an attractive position in a strategic group.
Market segments, strategic customer, etc.
• Blue Oceans’ are new market spaces where competition is minimised.
• ‘Red Oceans’ are where industries are already well defined and rivalry is intense.
• Blue Ocean thinking encourages entrepreneurs and managers to be different by finding or creating market spaces that are not currently being served.
A ‘strategy canvas’ compares competitors according to their performance in order to establish the extent of differentiation
VIRO analysis
Diagnosing Strategic Capability
Internal Analysis, The value chain, Generic strategies, etc
Those tools will be used to an individual report about communication sector (mobile phones)

Submission of Coursework etc.
It is your responsibility to submit your work on time and in the correct format and place. Electronic versions of your text will be compared with millions of other essays, other coursework items and published works throughout the UK university system and an ‘originality score’ will be calculated automatically to help us check for any academic unfair practice. Work will not be marked until it is submitted in full final format via Turnitin. Drafts may be discussed but will not marked. Do not send or email draft work for consideration.
Submit all work accordingly (with cover page):
• Student name:
• Student ID:
• Module name and code:
• Assignment name and number:
• Word count (where appropriate):
All assignments should be submitted on or before the due date, unless an extension has been granted by the marking tutor. Please check your Student Handbook for regulations and the assessment framework.
Any work submitted after the deadline will be deemed late. Your submission on ULearn will be checked once the deadline has passed to confirm that work has been submitted on time. Incomplete work will not be marked. Late work will be capped at a mark of 40.
In exceptional circumstances an extension may be granted for serious personal problems that prevent College attendance (e.g. certified illness). Any extensions must be negotiated in advance of the deadline, and not with support staff. It is the personal responsibility of the student whose work it is to ensure that all work is submitted on time and in the correct manner.
Feedback on assessed work:
Your work is first assessed by the tutor(s) responsible for that item. Each item is graded against its criteria and a mark out of 100% is given. The tutor writes comments to indicate strengths and weaknesses, and suggestions on how to improve your work. It is important to read these comments if you wish to gain higher marks in future. Normally, we aim to return coursework within three weeks of the deadline.

Writing and presenting guidance:
Referencing:
All references MUST conform to the Harvard style of referencing.
Layout and standard of presentation:
Your work must be typed or word-processed and contain no more than the appropriate word count. It should be 1.5 line spaced; have numbered pages; use a logical format; and be well presented, carefully edited and checked for spelling.
The word count includes main text but does not include the title, acknowledgements, contents page, tables, diagrams, reference lists or appendices The list of references should appear single spaced on a separate page. Place all references in one list in alphabetical order by author surname and do not use bullet points.
Standard of English:
Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation should be employed. Work should be clearly written in the required style (see Writing and Learning Centre resources in ULearn for help). Lists, bullet points and subheadings are acceptable in this format. Write from the third person perspective (avoid first and second person i.e. I, me, we, our, you) and employ a varied and appropriate vocabulary (avoid slang and informal expressions, repetition and contractions).
Structure:
Is your work clear and logical? Does the report contain an introduction, body and conclusion? Does the introduction set out the purpose of the report in a concise manner? Does the conclusion contain a summary of the main arguments together with key concluding statements? Does the report flow well? Is the line of argument coherent and well balanced?

Content/Discussion:
The report should demonstrate an appropriate depth of knowledge and understanding of relevant concepts, issues and trends; employ relevant data; possess clarity and quality of expression and explanation; develop a coherent line of argument, an ability to address the set topic; be accurate; reflect critical awareness; contain citations of appropriate literature; compare and contrast material effectively; employ a balanced use of evidence and relevant supporting statements. The work should avoid rambling, vague and unsupported statements.

Sources:
Is the report well researched? Are a wide range of relevant sources used to inform the report (e.g. plans, books, journals, reports)? Is material cited accurately and used to best effect? Are page numbers provided for quotes, data and specific ideas? Is a complete bibliography provided on a separate page at the end of the report using the Harvard style of referencing with accuracy?
Presentation styles:
When you are engaged in a group presentation you need to make sure you are professional throughout. All group members must be engaged with the task in hand and be focused on the presentation. If you are not speaking demonstrate your engagement and empathy with others. You must try to articulate your points clearly and avoid rambling or repetition. Slides used during presentations should be relevant, clear and include references where appropriate. If it helps consider the audience similarly to those in a job interview – be enthusiastic, clear, professional and interesting.

Resources:
Core electronic text

Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D. & Regnér P. (2017),
Exploring Strategy: Texts and Cases (11th edition)
Earlier editions mostly cover the required areas and are also fine.
Key Texts (Indicative):
Ackermann, F. & Eden, C. (2010 – Essay Writing Service: Write My Essay by Top-Notch Writer), Making Strategy
Anheier, H.K. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay), Non-profit Organizations: Theory, Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment, Policy (2nd Edition)
Barney, J.B., Hesterly, W. S. (2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service), Strategic Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment and competitive advantage: concepts and cases (5th edition)
Budd, L, Charlesworth J. & Paton, R. (2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers), Making Policy Happen
Campbell, D., Stonehouse, G. & Houston, B. (2011), Business Strategy
Cabinet Office (1999), Professional Policy Making for the Twenty-First Century
Cunningham, J., Harvey, B. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap), Strategy and Strategists
Doz, Y. L. & Hamel, G. (1998), Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering
Faulkner, D.O., Campbell, A. (2006 – Write a paper; Professional research paper writing service – Best essay writers) The Oxford Handbook of Strategy Ferlie, E. & Ongaro, E. (2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service), Strategic Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment in Public Services Organizations – Concepts, Schools and Contemporary Issues
Grant, R. (2013), Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Text and cases, 8th Edition
Gray, B. (1989), Collaborating: Finding common ground for multi-party problems
Huxham, C. & Vangen S. (2005), Managing to collaborate
John, P. (2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap), Analysing Public Policy (2nd edition)
Jenkins, M., Ambrosini, V. and Collier N. (2007), Advanced Strategic Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment: A Multi-Perspective Approach
Lindblom, C. (1990), ‘The Science of “Muddling Through’ in Pugh, D. (ed.) Organisation Theory
Mintzberg, H. (1994), The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning
Mintzberg, H. (2003), The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B, & Lampel, J, (1998). Strategy Safari: A Guided tour through the Wilds of Strategic Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value
Pettinger, R., (2004), Contemporary Strategic Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment Porter, M. (1996), What is strategy?
Segal-Horn, S. (2004), The Strategy Reader
Stacey, R.D. (2007), Strategic Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity to Ways of Thinking About Organisations Sydow, J, Shüßler, E, Müller-Seitz, G. (2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service). Managing Inter-Organizational Relations
White, C. (2004), Strategic Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment
Wit, B. de (2003), Strategy: Process, Content, Cases

Johnson, G., Regner, P., Scholes, K., Angwin, D. (2017) Exploring Strategy. Text and Cases. Harlow, Pearson. Chapters 2 and 3 – available in pdf format.

Appendix 1: Group Strategic Assignment
0% – 39% 40% – 49% 50% – 59% 60% – 69% 70-84% 85% – 100%
Knowledge
on cases and
sector Very weak understanding, based on little or no research on cases or sector. It fails to
demonstrate any understanding of the topic. No evidence is provided to support arguments. Argument lacks relevance, direction, accuracy and substance Poor understanding of
the case and sector, although there is some limited evidence of attempts to research it.
Recommendations often based on limited evidence and are
poorly structured. Some understanding,
demonstrates research of the topic, but lacks thoroughness.
Discussion is often informative, clear and well-structured with
some sound evidence to support arguments. Competent understanding. Draws on a reasonable number of sound and relevant sources and presents relevant evidence to support arguments.
Discussion is well structured, but lacks depth, insights and
drawing together different points of view. Excellent content drawing
on a wide range of pertinent sources. Presents robust evidence to support claims. Topic discussed clearly and cogently, drawing on a number of different points of view.
Demonstrates ability to
evaluate literature sources
and their merits. Exceptional
understanding from varied and relevant sources. Evidence
presented and topic cogently presented from a number of
perspectives. Clear evaluation of all literature sources.
Analysis There is no evaluation or analysis; it is entirely descriptive Unable to use key concepts appropriately and meaningfully in analysis of the organisation(s). It is largely descriptive. Key concepts used to
make sense of data,
although presented in a superficial manner and does not go beyond the standard interpretation. Uses key concepts to
generate robust and
reliable insights into the
organisation(s). Well argued
analysis. Key concepts used and
independent judgement and original insights often made on the organisation(s).
Sophisticated analysis. Concepts used with
independent judgement
and original insights on
the organisation(s).
Sophisticated analysis
clearly presented.
Teamwork Few team members were
involved in the presentation or preparation, there is confusion about the division of labour, and distinctly separate pieces
of work. Poorly managed team.
Preparation, delivering the presentation and managing the debate is not shared equally
between members.
Clear differences in
contributions. Well managed with reasonable division of labour, everybody
performing an appropriate role with a few gaps between individual contributions. The team is well managed. A good division of labour with
everybody performing an appropriate role, minor gaps between individual
contributions

Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment of the presentation is excellent.
Good division of labour. The group has pooled their
efforts to achieve the task. Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under   homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment of the
presentation is
outstanding. Good
division of labour. The
group has developed
something they could
not do on their own.

Presentation Lacking clarity in delivery
and communication. Very
difficult to understand or
follow the argument.
Weak structure and time
allowance. Poor choices
in use of delivery tools
(e.g. PowerPoint, flip chart). Answers to questions lack relevance and substance Basic presentation.
Lack of attention to presenting information – often confusing and lacking in clarity.
Presentation is too short for topic and tools used
inappropriately. Answers to questions are simplistic and lack familiarity with topic. Demonstrates
appropriate media use,
yet communication of
ideas lack coherence
and clarity. Sufficient
time allowed for presenting topic.
Answers address questions yet are unsupported and are occasionally inaccurate. Competent media use.
Presentation lacks either some clarity or coherence. Delivery
choice is appropriate with legible and informative content. Sufficient time is allowed for presenting
topic. Answers to questions show a good familiarity with the topic. Excellent presentation.
Enthusiastic, clear,
coherent and direct.
Delivery is engaging, with
legible and informative
content. Sufficient time is
allowed for presenting.
Answers to questions are
reflective and demonstrate
a wide familiarity of the
topic. Outstanding
presentation.
Enthusiastic, coherent
and original delivery
Time allowed for
presenting the topic.
Answers to questions
are insightful,
professional, and
demonstrate a wide
familiarity of the topic.

Appendix 2: Time Limited Assignment Marking Criteria
0% – 39% 40% – 49% 50% – 59% 60% – 69% 70-84% 85% – 100%
Strategy concepts Very weak understanding of key concepts and unable to use them appropriately. There is little or no evidence of familiarity of strategy sources (e.g. textbooks, journals, business reports). Basic and underdevelopment understanding of key concepts, little familiarity of strategy sources, frequently relying on lecture notes. A reasonable understanding of key concepts and some familiarity with principal strategy textbooks. A good understanding of concepts based on a wide range of strategy sources. Demonstrates an excellent understanding and wide familiarity of key concepts based on a comprehensive range strategy sources. Exceptional understanding of relevant concepts, their usefulness and applicability from a complete range of sources.
Knowledge on organisations and their sectors Knowledge of
organisations and sectors
is superficial and rudimentary and reliant on a few inappropriate sources.
Some appropriate sources, but knowledge about the organisations and sectors lacks relevance, direction, accuracy and substance. Reasonable knowledge of organisations and sectors but very standard, using several reliable sources. Good understanding of organisations and sectors clearly identifying their significant features and trends. Use of a range of reliable sources. Excellent understanding of organisations and sectors clearly identifying their significant features and trends. Use of all the relevant sources. Outstanding insight on organisations and sectors demonstrating features, trends and how to prioritise them.
Use of all sources.
Analysis There is no evaluation or analysis; the report is entirely descriptive. Unable to use key concepts appropriately and meaningfully in analysis of the organisation(s). Report is largely descriptive. Key concepts used to make sense of data, although analysis is presented in a superficial manner and does not go beyond the standard interpretation. Uses key concepts to generate robust and reliable insights into the organisation(s). Well-presented and clearly argued analysis. Key concepts used and independent judgement and some original insight on the organisation(s). Excellent analysis, clearly presented and argued. Concepts used with independent judgement and original insights on the organisation(s). Sophisticated analysis, clearly presented and cogent argument.
Reporting Report lacks a structure or clarity with careless referencing. Numerous instances of poor spelling and grammar. Its overall presentation is untidy and unprofessional. Report has limited structure with some poor referencing. Several examples of weak spelling and grammar, and the overall presentation is confusing. Report is clearly structured, although it lacks clarity in places. Few spelling, grammatical and referencing errors; the overall presentation is standard. The overall structure is robust and consistent outlining a clear and logical argument. Spelling, grammar and referencing is good; overall presentation is professional. Report structure is consistent and outlines an excellent argument. No spelling, grammatical and referencing errors; presentation is highly professional. Report structure is robust, consistent and outlines a sophisticated argument. No spelling, grammatical and referencing; presentation is exemplary.

Order | Check Discount