Posted: April 20th, 2022

Assignment Brief CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SIB7505-A

UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD
MSc CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY SIB7505-A
INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT

Assessment Information
Students are required to complete a 2000-word individual essay as an assessment for this module. This assignment will constitute 100% of the final module mark. The assignment will test the students’ critical understanding of theoretical perspectives on ethics and various techniques and practices employed in today’s organisation to tackle social and environmental responsibility challenges. The students will also need to show their skills in applying this theoretical knowledge to the analysis and resolution of ethical business problems.
Assignment Brief
Think about an ethically problematic situation you personally experienced or witnessed in an organisation where you are/were a member. Ace my homework – Write a reflective essay, answering the following questions:
a) Briefly describe the situation.
b) Explain why this situation is ethically problematic and what ethical issues/dimensions are involved in it.
c) Did the organisation do anything to resolve the situation? Was it effective and ethical?
d) Propose your own approach to resolving the situation and explain why your approach will actually work in practice.
In answering these questions, you are required to apply theories and perspectives that were discussed in class. You do not need to apply a large number of theories or frameworks. Make your selection carefully and only use theoretical perspectives that have demonstrable relevance to the topic of your essay.
It is of utmost importance that you critically consider the practical usefulness of the problem resolution approach you propose. For instance, a company code of conduct adopted in an organisation with thoroughly corrupt upper management to fight bribery is unlikely to have any impact on the use of bribery. You need to provide a clear and well-researched and supported explanation of why you think your approach has a chance of making a practical difference.
a) Choosing an Ethically Problematic Situation to Ace my homework – Write About
It is of utmost importance that you write about a situation you experienced or witnessed personally in an organisation where you were a member. A choice of a situation that you are simply familiar with from reading about it in the media or from television news is not appropriate as it will not provide you with specific enough information for an in-depth analysis. You can consider a variety of organisations, not just for-profit companies: your former or present workplace, school or university where you were a student, a charity where you volunteered, or a club you attended.
If you are struggling to identify an appropriate situation, try simply to consider the regular activities of your organisations. Many ethical problems are not apparent as such until you start examining then closely.
The situation needs to be clearly and very specifically defined. Do not try to tackle overly broad subjects such as the ethics of the arms trade in general, diversity in all its forms or the whole of the Nigerian oil industry. Make sure that your subject is narrow and can be explained in about 200 words.
b) Explain why this situation is ethically problematic and what ethical issues/dimensions are involved in it.
In your analysis, ensure that you can clearly explain why the situation you describe is ethically problematic. In other words, what exactly is the problem? Does the problem have several different ethical dimensions?
First, please explain why the issue you selected is ethically problematic. You should describe and evaluate the problematic dimensions of the identified organisational issue applying one theory such consequentialist theory, non-consequentialist theory, stakeholder theory etc. I need help writing my essay – research paper be aware that the application of different theories of ethics may not necessarily yield the same conclusions (e.g. the outcomes may be appropriate, but the means of achieving them may not be).

c) Management analysis of the selected organisational issue.
Did the organisation do anything to resolve the situation? Was it effective and ethical?
You should describe and evaluate how the management of the organisation addressed, are planning to address or did not address the selected organisational issue. This assessment should provide sufficient details related to which specific management decisions were taken (or will be taken), related to the specific aspects of the organisational issue and/or stakeholders/ The assessment of management’s actions should be critical and well supported to related academic and practitioner literature.
You can use a variety of theoretical perspectives on ethics, CSR, stakeholders and sustainability to conduct your evaluation. I need help writing my essay – research paper make use of different categories of perspectives:

• broad theories of ethics and ethical decision-making (consequentialist, non-consequentialist, etc.)
• perspectives on the efficacy of specific management tools and techniques that can be used to foster ethical and responsible conduct in organisations
• perspectives on ethical issues relating to specific stakeholder groups.

d) Recommendations for resolving the organisational issue
Based on your previous analyses, and incorporating your learning related to different stakeholders’ ethical and responsibility issues, you should provide specific recommendations for the selected organisation to resolve the organisational issue. It is crucial that you consider carefully and explain how your recommendations may be practically applicable.
It is important that your recommendations are supported by sufficient literature, including related data where applicable.

The structure
The following provides specific guidance on writing the essay. The essay should contain the following:
• Introduction (around 200 words)
• An overview of the selected organisational issue (around 200 words).
• Ethical analysis of the selected organisational issue
• Management analysis of the selected organisational issue
• Proposed recommendations for resolving the organisational issue
• A brief conclusion section that summarises the key aspects of the essay (around 200 words)
• A reference list

Submission Guideline
Submission date: 9th May, 2022 before 3:00PM
You need to submit an electronic copy (via Turnitin in Canvas), in an assignment format.
This is an academic piece of work and it must answer the questions stated above. The coursework should be word-processed, use Ariel 12-point font and 1.5 line spacing. Word count must be clearly indicated in the coursework.
Feedback on preliminary module results will be available on module Canvas site after 20 working days Assessed work which exceeds a specified maximum permitted length will be subject to a penalty deduction of marks equivalent to the percentage of additional words over the limit. Students who do not submit assessed work and do not gain approval in advance for missed assessed work, including for any previously agreed extension, shall receive a mark of 0%. Regulations for late submissions can be found at: PGT Section 9.6

Marking Guidelines

The Strategic Management individual assignment is marked by allocating grades (weighted at 100%) to the subsections of the assignment listed on the table below:

Assignment Subsections Grades
1 Introduction & conclusion. 10
2 An overview of the selected organisational issue. 10
3 Ethical analysis of the selected organisational issue. 25
4 Management analysis of the selected organisational issue
25
5 Recommendations for resolving the organisational issue
20
6 Presentation & structure, complete & accurate reference list. 10

Organisation and Style of the Essay
It is expected that you will present a work that will have a clear topic/focus, coherent structure and clear conclusions. The introduction of your essay should contain a clear statement of its purpose and focus. The initial description of the situation you will analyse should be brief (200 words maximum). The bulk of the space should be spent on analysis. The answers to the assignment question should be, first and foremost, analytical and not merely descriptive. They should be based on theory and thorough research of both academic and practitioner literature. The analysis should tell an effective story, integrating different strands of thought. You should use theory as an interpretive lens for looking at your ethical problem and potential solutions. Theory and academic literature should be your source of novel interpretations of the problem and of ideas regarding solutions.
All arguments and statements of fact should be supported by evidence from reputable sources. Presenting a personal viewpoint is acceptable, but only if supported by evidence from and analysis of appropriate literature. The analysis should lead to clearly explained conclusions and recommendations.
In completing your assignment, please ensure that it covers all assignment questions. Failing to complete all aspects of the assignment is the main cause of students failing to get the marks that their time and efforts deserve. Your assignment must be word-processed. Before submission, please ensure that you proof-read and edit your work. It is better to do so a day or two after completing your final draft as some time away from the work will allow you to develop a more distance and critical outlook. However, ensure that you do this way in advance of the submission deadline. Watch out for spelling and grammatical mistakes.
Reference pages, tables, figures and appendices are not included into the word count. Be aware, however, that tables and figures are for summary and illustration purposes only and should not be used to circumvent word count rules.

Marking Criteria:

CRITERIA Outstanding/
Excellent
68% and over
Very good

67-60%
Satisfactory

59-50%
Basic

49-40%
Significant fail

39-30%
Substantial fail

Less than 29%
PRESENTATION
STRUCTURE
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
& REFERENCING Excellent, polished and coherent structure. Very good, careful and logical organization throughout Satisfactory presentation and structure with a reasonable degree of coherence and structure Basic attempt to organize thoughts in a logical manner. Meaning apparent Very unclear and with poor structure. . Disorganized without structure.
Excellent fluency and academic writing.
Thoughts and Ideas clearly expressed Good spelling, grammar, and academic writing style. Thoughts and ideas clearly expressed Reasonable spelling and grammar.
Some attempt at academic style Basic errors in spelling, grammar. , careless structure Inadequate spelling, grammar,
KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING Excellent demonstration of knowledge and understanding of the relevant theory and research to address the topic at hand Very clear and appropriate demonstration of knowledge and understanding of the relevant theory and research to address the topic at hand. Reasonable demonstration of knowledge and understanding of the literature. However, it would have benefited from additional academic references Basic demonstration of knowledge and understanding of the relevant theory and research. Additional key literature should have been used. Poor demonstration of knowledge and understanding of the relevant theory and research. Basic literature to address the topic should have been identified and used No demonstration of knowledge and understanding of the relevant theory and research.
CRISTICAL ANALYSIS/ APPLICATION
Excellent demonstration of critical analysis and coverage of the relevant issues. Obvious and subtle issues dealt with, very good application of theory Identifies obvious issues only, good application of theory Identifies obvious issues only, weak application of theory Fails to identify key issues, poor or no attempt at application of theory
EVALUATION/CONCONLUSIONS Excellent evaluation, critical judgment and problem solving Good evaluation, critical judgment and problem solving Reasonable evaluation, critical judgment and problem solving Weak evaluation, critical judgment and problem solving Poor/no attempt at evaluation, critical judgment, or problem solving

Order | Check Discount