Posted: January 15th, 2023

Assignment 2 Brief

Assignment 2 Brief

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES:

Question 2:

Using the case study called: “Severstal: growth and consolidation strategies in a turbulent global steel industry” from Johnson et al (2017, p.557) critically discuss the motives for Severstal’s acquisitions strategy and assess the suitability and impact of this strategy in relations to the company’s international strategy.

ASSIGNMENT 2: INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT: FEEDBACK FORM

STUDENT ID:

TUTOR: GRADE:

SECTION
CRITERIA TO BE ASSESSED Above 70% 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29% 10-19% 0-9%

OVERALL STRUCTURE (5%)
The written work is structured clearly and coherently without any spelling errors, the language and grammar is appropriate.

PART 1: INTRODUCTION (25%)
The objectives are clearly stated so are the main sources of information and the focus of the work.

PART 2: THEORETICAL FRAMWORK/MODELS (30%)
Theoretical framework(s) and/or model(s) are adequately stated, described and applied with a clear discussion and interpretation of the analysis of a chosen case study.

PART 3: CONCLUSIONS (35%)

Key findings are clearly presented and discussed with evidence of critical thinking.
Note: This is an important part of your work in which you also articulate what you have learned as a result your research for this assignment.

REFERENCING (5%)
The work contains academic references and /or citations. The Ace my homework – Write my essay – Harvard Reference System is used for referencing and bibliography

Tutor’s Comments:

ASSESSMENT GRADE DESCRIPTORS

~ Hire our professional writers now and experience the best assignment help online with our custom paper writing service. We ensure your essays and assignments are expertly researched, written and delivered on time. ~ Grading structure will give you an idea how marks will be allocated based on the above criteria.

The grades indicate the likely characteristics of work that is marked within the percentage bands indicated.

INDICATOR % PRESENTATION WILL OFTEN DEMONSTRATE SOME OF THE FOLLOWING FEATURES
90-100 An exceptional level of analysis, showing deep critical engagement with a comprehensive range of contextual material. Demonstration of independent thought resulting in creative and original responses to the assignment brief. Clear evidence of understanding of current scholarship and research based on an extensive range of relevant sources. Clarity of structure demonstrating complete focus of argument. Virtually no errors in referencing/grammar and/or syntax.
80-89 Excellent links between relevant ideas, theories and practice. Clear evidence of independent scholarship and the ability to engage critically and analytically with a range of contextually relevant resource material. Demonstration of insights supported by extremely well structured overall argument. Very few errors in referencing/grammar and/or syntax.
70-79 Very good links between a range of different ideas and theories. Places issues in a wider context. Clear evidence of a critical understanding of a range of relevant theories and application of these appropriately. Independent ideas, well-argued and supported. Few errors in referencing/grammar and/or syntax.
60-69 Clear links between theory and practice. Good coverage of assignment issues. Full understanding of core issues. Evidenced level of understanding of appropriate theory and concepts. Some small repeated errors in referencing/grammar and/or syntax.
50-59 Identifies main issues and relevant theory. Coverage of most of assignment issues. Competent application of relevant theory and states obvious links to practice. Some repeated errors in grammar or syntax possibly failure to apply Ace my homework – Write my essay – Harvard referencing standard correctly in places.
40-49 Makes few links between theory and practice. Answers question in a very basic way. Describes relevant theory accurately ad some relevant ideas offered. Possibly failure to apply Ace my homework – Write my essay – Harvard referencing standard correctly. Limited coherence of structure.
30-39 Some learning outcomes and/or assessment criteria not met. Inadequate content with issues not addressed, insufficient evidence of understanding of relevant theory and concepts and only partial understanding shown. Very limited application of theory and/or models.
20-29 Little attempt to engage with the assignment brief, learning outcomes not fully met. No demonstration of adequate knowledge or understanding of key concepts or theories. There is no recognition of the complexity of the subject.
10-19 Little attempt to engage with the assignment, learning outcomes not met. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice.
0-9 No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes.
—-
The assignment brief provided is for an individual assignment on the topic of Severstal’s acquisition strategy in the steel industry. The student is expected to critically discuss the motives for Severstal’s acquisitions strategy and assess the suitability and impact of this strategy in relation to the company’s international strategy. The assignment is to be based on the case study “Severstal: growth and consolidation strategies in a turbulent global steel industry” from Johnson et al (2017, p.557)

The assignment will be graded based on several criteria:

Overall Structure (5%): The work should be structured clearly and coherently without any spelling errors and the language and grammar should be appropriate.

Introduction (25%): The objectives of the assignment should be clearly stated, as well as the main sources of information and the focus of the work.

Theoretical Framework/Models (30%): Theoretical framework(s) and/or model(s) should be adequately stated, described, and applied with a clear discussion and interpretation of the analysis of the chosen case study.

Conclusions (35%): Key findings should be clearly presented and discussed with evidence of critical thinking. The student should also articulate what they have learned as a result of their research for this assignment.

Referencing (5%): The work should contain academic references and/or citations. The Ace my homework – Write my essay – Harvard Reference System should be used for referencing and bibliography.

The grade will be based on the above criteria, with higher grades indicating work that demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic, appropriate use of theory and models, critical thinking and analysis, and a well-written and well-organized final product. The Tutor’s comments will also be provided for the student’s reference.

Order | Check Discount