Posted:

If a police agency is investigating one of their own officers in an administrative

If a police agency is investigating one of their own officers in an administrative proceeding (internal affairs investigation) relative to an allegation of theft by the officer, but the officer is not in custody and the subject offer is not part of the union, then which of the following warnings should be given to the officer before the statement proceeds:Question 1 options:Miranda WarningsGarrity Rights ReadWeingarten Rights ReadAll of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 2 (1 point)As to internal affairs investigations or administrative investigations of a police officer’s alleged inappropriate conduct:Question 2 options:The charges must generally be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt”Are generally unrestricted by statutes and procedures as it is the police investigating the policeAre often played out in civil courtNone of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 3 (1 point)Arbitration used in law enforcement disciplinary processes generally:Question 3 options:Slower than litigation because it is “behind closed doors”The proper venue for challenging an agency’s disciplinary actions if there is a Collective Bargaining Agreement that covers the subject employeeOccur during the internal investigation itself as a method of discoveryAll of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 4 (1 point)As to arbitration’s use by law enforcement agencies relative to disciplinary actions:Question 4 options:The arbitrator’s award are usually reversed on appeal because judges don’t appreciate such alternative resolution processesA violation of Due Process as the accused police officer is not tried by a jury of his or her peers.Have limited discovery rights and procedures as compared to traditional litigation forums and venues.All of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 5 (1 point)As to the use of arbitration by law enforcement agencies relative to workplace issues:Question 5 options:Arbitration is often mandated by the collective bargaining agreement if there is dispute between the agency and the union;Arbitration often reaches a quicker final result then litigationCertain federal actions like discrimination or alleged violations of whistleblower protections by an law enforcement agency against an officer are not required to solely be heard by an arbitratorAll of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 6 (1 point)As to the government procuring practices:Question 6 options:Law enforcement agencies do not have to follow such procedures because they are rendering public safety services and have the discretion to enter contracts at willOften the resulting contracts have provisions that are “subject to funding” which allows the law enforcement agency to cancel if yearly appropriations of funding by its parent funding agency are not realizedGenerally do not have to be open to competitive bidding processesAll of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 7 (1 point)As to managements of grants that are given to law enforcement agencies:Question 7 options:Eventually the law enforcement agency must pay them back at the end of the termThe funds can be transferred to other law enforcement agencies by the grantee if the grantee does not use them in timeAre generally limited to specific uses dictated by the terms of the grantAll of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 8 (1 point)Permissible off duty employment of law enforcement personnel on “details” (private security) using the agency uniform, badge, equipment, gun, radio and vehicle:Question 8 options:Cannot expose the law enforcement agency employer to Section 1983 liability as the law enforcement employee is not acting under “color of law”Cannot expose the law enforcement agency employer to Section 1983 liability as the law enforcement employee is not acting “on the clock”Are often a source of litigation against the law enforcement agencyAll of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 9 (1 point)As to “take home” police vehicles:Question 9 options:Such policies are often challenged in court by tax payers because they are a form of mis-appropriation of government tax dollarsExpose the law enforcement agency to additional liabilityAre never addressed in union security agreements as it is not an important compensation issue in the minds of the police officers and their unionsNone of the provided answers to this question are correctQuestion 10 (1 point)As to mutual aid agreements or joint task force agreements:Question 10 options:They are formal contracts often written and signed by various law enforcement agency representativesAre not technically necessary as all law enforcement personnel have multi-jurisdictional powersNever expose one agency to liability for other partner agency actions in a joint operationNone of the answers provided for this question is correctQuestion 11 (1 point)Law enforcement officers do not get to be read Miranda rights when being quested by internal affairs about an allegation that they committed a criminal act as the internal affairs process is administrative in nature only, even if the internal affairs officers will be forwarding the statement to the local prosecutors laterQuestion 11 options:TrueFalseQuestion 12 (1 point)Internal affairs investigations are seen as a way to help “self regulate” the law enforcement profession by law enforcement agenciesQuestion 12 options:TrueFalseQuestion 13 (1 point)Generally, law enforcement officer who are being investigated for criminal acts and who are on leave from the force are generally still paid until they are placed under arrest occurs because of union security agreement provisionsQuestion 13 options:TrueFalseQuestion 14 (1 point)Police agencies and unions prefer litigation, rather than arbitration, when dealing with employment issues because it brings to light the internal issues of the agency which is a governmental unitQuestion 14 options:TrueFalseQuestion 15 (1 point)Whistleblower actions are generally filed in court, rather than in arbitration, as the remedies and protection afforded by the courts to the employee who legitimately “blows the whistle” are greater and more practically enforced by court ordersQuestion 15 options:TrueFalseQuestion 16 (1 point)Generally, forfeiture actions instituted by law enforcement agencies against property require the law enforcement agency to satisfy the “beyond a reasonable doubt” evidentiary standard for the law enforcement agency to prevailQuestion 16 options:TrueFalseQuestion 17 (1 point)The funds collected from forfeiture actions generally can be used for any law enforcement purpose later by the seizing agency, if they prevail in court in their forfeiture actionQuestion 17 options:TrueFalseQuestion 18 (1 point)Generally, a law enforcement agency should make all of their contracts in which they must pay money for goods or services “subject to funding” by their funding authority.Question 18 options:TrueFalseQuestion 19 (1 point)Off duty private security details by law enforcement officers do not pose a risk of liability to the law enforcement agency because the subject officer is off dutyQuestion 19 options:TrueFalseQuestion 20 (1 point)When law enforcement agencies wish to purchase goods or services, often governmental procurement codes and procedures apply to the process of selecting a contracting partyQuestion 20 options:TrueFalse

Order | Check Discount