Posted: March 3rd, 2020

Highlight parts are the Center point to explain

First:
The content should to relate and prove this idea: Mary Shelley depicted the idea of madness through Victor, showing that how Victor’s has been leading to the path of no return by his life experiences and characters.
Having awakened his creature, Frankenstein flees, his two-year pursuit yielding an experience of revulsion. But instead of a sleep of forgetfulness, which he consciously desires, he dreams of a blooming Elizabeth met with in the streets of Ingolstadt. She is his dear foster-sister, whom he has not seen for two years. He embraces her, kisses her, and instantly her lips assume ” the hue of death ” : “her features appeared to change, and I thought I held the corpse of my dead mother in my arms.” Then awake, in horror he beholds ” the wretch—the miserable monster whom I have created ” (pp. 56-57). Is this the monster of incest? Yes, and more: ” The wretch ” is the embodied life of Frankenstein’s desire to possess the mother, which has as its waking focus an intense possession of Elizabeth, the substitute mother, one’s own peer, whom Victor long ago considered his exclusive possession and whose existence, he later feels, is bound up in his (p. 87). That he should dream of meeting, embracing and kissing Elizabeth after fleeing from his quickened creature suggests a double consciousness: waking thoughts flee the desires his creature manifests—as signified by its physiognomy—and which Franken stein has brought forth from the charnel house of his unconscious. But the real wish gains partial beauty in dreams, yet under horrific censorship. Upon awakening, Frankenstein sees his creature, the now independent life he has brought forth. But all he sees is physiognomy invested with his desire—a physical correlation for his deep wishes projected, under censorship through consciousness, onto the other.

Second:
The content should to relate and prove this idea: Victor Frankenstein possesses all those characteristics or traits that clearly show he was mentally ill which leads him become the true monster mentally.
If Mary offers I need help writing my essay – research paper Analyze These Two Quotes Separately From Two Article Talking About Mary Shelley’s Frankensteinan antidote to Frankenstein’s fate, it is neither an obvious nor an easy one. She glimpses the intract ability of personal desire in contradistinction to the humane tractability of participatory community—if only with one other person. Perhaps this is part of her insistence on what we might call hippocratic love: manifested in those devoted attentions certain characters show to others—Caroline to her father, then later Elizabeth, then Justine to Caroline, and Elizabeth to the doubly stricken family after Justine’s death. Often the women would nurse their men and the redeemed men—Clerval and Walton—are nurses to Frankenstein. In psychic allegory, one reading of a nurse’s solicitous love for the patient answers to the child’s demand for singular attention and therein possession of the mother in her devotion. In this even Walton and Clerval become versions of the desired mother for Frankenstein.20 But they are more for Mary Shelley: they hold the promise of redemption from psychic tyranny in a turn outward from the self toward others, toward the wide world of men and women in communities of achievement. Perhaps, as we recover from Frankenstein’s catastrophe, this is not enough. Of course we would have more. Why or how are we to settle for less than our desires demand? Mary’s answer, I think, is that we have little choice: if we continue to pursue what we have lost—our mothers, our babies, our archaic loves and hates—we shall never grow up, indeed, we shall grow mad. This, however, is held in the face of another recognition: that Walton as a solution is only a framework, an idealized ending which by the very force of idealization reveals the strange attraction of promethean desires. Walton too would defy his denying father, consign his crew to death, and even abandon his sister—with whom he has an incestuous relationship sub limated into epistolary tenderness. And though he relents, against Frankenstein’s wishes (his double), those desires have not been either plumbed to the fullest or happily resolved: only banished from the healthy ego in anything like their original form. That banishment is good if we would not murder the Clerval in us; but those desires still haunt us in their distant exile. The creature Frankenstein pursued does not die at novel’s end: it disappears into the darkness.

Order | Check Discount