Professional Writers
We assemble our team by selectively choosing highly skilled writers, each boasting specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and a robust background in academic writing
Find The Best Nursing Paper Writers For Your Assignments
You Can order for custom written paper 24/7! by completig a form in 3 steps. Get those desired coursework assessment grades!
Posted: February 23rd, 2022
Psychopathology
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. | 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s).
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current credible sources. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s).
Is It Legal to Use Essay Writing Services?Yes, it’s completely legal! Using our services is like hiring a tutor to guide you. If you’re wondering, “Is EssayBishops legit?”—rest assured, we are! Our professional writers create custom, high-quality papers tailored to your needs, helping you boost your grades with confidence. Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 credible references. |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references. |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s).
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only 1 or no credible references. |
|
| Main Posting: Writing | 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely.
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Further adheres to current Ace homework tutors – APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Written concisely.
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current Ace homework tutors – APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Written somewhat concisely.
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some Ace homework tutors – APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current Ace homework tutors – APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Posting: Timely and full participation | 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts main discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Posts main discussion by due date.
Meets requirements for full participation. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Posts main discussion by due date. | 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post main discussion by due date. |
|
| First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. | 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. | 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth. | 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. | |
| First Response: Writing | 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
|
| First Response: Timely and full participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date. | 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date. |
|
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. | 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. | 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth. | 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. | |
| Second Response: Writing | 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response: Timely and full participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Posts by due date. | 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Name: NRNP_6635_Week1_Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion_Rubric
Why choose us
You Want Quality and That’s What We Deliver
Discounted Prices
Our service is committed to delivering the finest writers at the most competitive rates, ensuring that affordability is balanced with uncompromising quality. Our pricing strategy is designed to be both fair and reasonable, standing out favorably against other writing services in the market.
AI & Plagiarism-Free
Rest assured, you'll never receive a product tainted by plagiarism or AI-generated content. Each paper is research-written by human writers, followed by a rigorous scanning process of the final draft before it's delivered to you, ensuring the content is entirely original and maintaining our unwavering commitment to providing plagiarism-free work.
How it works
When you decide to place an order with Nurscola, here is what happens: