Posted: August 15th, 2022

SOC 320 Final Project

SOC 320 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Overview The final project for this course is the creation of a position paper to illustrate the position of a social advocacy group on a gender-related issue. You will assume

the role of a researcher for a social advocacy group that focuses on issues related to gender. You will assume that your manager has tasked you with writing a

position paper that clearly articulates the group’s stance on a given gender-related issue in an attempt to justify the ultimate goal of the social advocacy group. You will select an issue from the options provided or submit your own issue for instructor approval. You will then analyze the issue through the incorporation of

evidence and the application of sociological theory.

You are encouraged to choose your own topic to address in the position paper and will be guided through this process in the early modules of the course. Some

gender-related issues to you might consider focusing on in this project include the following:

 Fraternity hazing  Equal pay for women  Allowing children to transition to their self-identified gender  Adoption rights for same-sex couples  Gender-neutral bathrooms in the workplace

The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to provide you opportunities to conduct research and

work on elements of your paper. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.

In the position paper, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

 Analyze views of gender from a historical perspective for their impact on today’s societies and individuals  Challenge current stereotypes of various gender expressions using evidence from observations and other resources  Determine how reactions to expressions of gender and gender identity have evolved over time supported by sociological theory  Communicate results of analyses on gender issues adhering to ethical requirements and other best practices regarding sociological research

1

Prompt For your position paper, you will represent the position of your social advocacy group on a specific issue related to gender and support that position through the

application of sociological theory and evidence. Your position will challenge preconceived notions around this issue by investigating its history and how it has

evolved over time. The goal of this paper is to promote awareness around your chosen issue and encourage support for your social advocacy group.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Introduction: In this section, you will introduce your audience to the gender issue you have chosen. You will develop a statement that establishes your position on your chosen issue. Be sure to employ appropriate ethical considerations and best practices when communicating your introduction.

A. Provide a brief overview of your chosen gender issue. Explain the impact of the issue related to social roles within social institutions. B. Based on your chosen issue, discuss the focus of this position paper in terms of how it aligns with the ultimate goal of the social advocacy group.

In other words, what are you trying to accomplish by exploring this gender issue?

C. Briefly discuss the evidence that you will use in the analysis of the issue. D. Briefly introduce the theory that you will use in the analysis of the issue. E. Develop a statement that communicates your social advocacy group’s position on the issue.

II. Analysis: Now that you have identified a gender issue, analyze evidence and apply sociological theory to communicate and support your position. Be sure to employ appropriate ethical considerations and best practices when constructing your analysis.

A. Articulate in detail your social advocacy group’s position regarding the issue. Your description should be written in a way that leads into your evidence and theory application.

B. Evaluate prevalent stereotypes regarding the issue. Be sure to address the validity, effects, and persistence of these stereotypes. C. Describe recent social change regarding the issue and support your response with examples. D. Analyze historical interpretations of the issue within relevant social structures (i.e., social institutions and culture) and support your analysis with

evidence.

E. Analyze modern interpretations of the issue within relevant social structures (i.e., social institutions and culture) and support your analysis with evidence.

F. Apply appropriate sociological theory to historical and modern interpretations of the issue to support your overall analysis.

2

III. Conclusion: In this section of the position paper, you will summarize the key points of your analysis while adhering to appropriate ethical standards and best practices.

A. Describe the ethical challenges in analyzing the issue, supporting your response with examples. B. Review the key points of your analysis and make a universal statement about your position regarding the issue. Consider summarizing insights

and perspectives that were gained through the incorporation of evidence.

C. Determine possible solutions that would be effective in lessening the negative impact of the issue on society. D. Communicate your final position on this issue, supported by the findings of your analysis.

Milestones Milestone One: Mapping the Issue Worksheet

In Module Three, you will submit a worksheet that includes the gender-related issue you selected for the project, a brief description of the social advocacy group,

three or four research sources that you will use to present sociological evidence, and the theoretical lenses you may apply to your analysis. This milestone will be

graded with the Milestone One Rubric.

Milestone Two: Detailed Outline

In Module Five, you will create a detailed outline for your final paper, synthesizing all of your work in the course to date. This includes the following:

 Your position statement on the issue  Identification of stereotypes that may need to be challenged in order for others to accept your position  A list of historical events from the last decade that have affected perceptions on this issue (historical interpretations)  Identification of the social changes these historic events have caused  Explanation of current perceptions related to this issue (modern interpretations) within the family, the media, educational institutions, and organized

religion

 Description of the theoretical lenses that you will use to support the analysis of the historical and modern interpretations

This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.

Final Submission: Position Paper

In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should

reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.

3

4

Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your position paper should be 6 to 8 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and written in Ace homework tutors – APA format. Use double

spacing, 12-point T imes New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Get custom essay samples and course-specific study resources via course hero homework for you service – Include at least three references cited in Ace homework tutors – APA format.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Introduction:

Issue

[SOC-320-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates a nuanced

understanding of the impact of

gender on social roles and

institutions

Provides a brief overview of the

issue and explains the impact of

the issue related to social roles

within social institutions

Provides an overview of the issue

and explains the impact of the

issue related to social roles within

social institutions, but overview is

unclear or lacks key details

Does not provide an overview of

the issue

6

Introduction:

Ultimate Goal

[SOC-320-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and is exceptionally clear and

contextualized

Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discusses the focus of the position

paper and how it aligns with the

ultimate goal of the social

advocacy group

Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discusses the focus of the position

paper and how it aligns with the

ultimate goal of the social

advocacy group, but response is

cursory

Does not discuss the focus of the

position paper

6

Introduction:

Evidence

[SOC-320-02]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses sociological jargon to

establish expertise

Briefly discusses the evidence that

will be used in the analysis of the

issue

Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discusses the evidence that will be

used in the analysis of the issue,

but evidence chosen does not

support the topic

Does not discuss the evidence that

will be used in the analysis of the

issue

6

Introduction:

Theory

[SOC-320-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and choice of theory is well supported

and plausible

Briefly introduces the theory that

will be used in the analysis of the

issue

Introduces the theory that will be

used in the analysis of the issue,

but theory chosen is inappropriate

for topic

Does not introduce the theory that

will be used in the analysis of the

issue

8

Introduction:

Statement

[SOC-320-04]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and is exceptionally clear and

contextualized

Develops a statement that

communicates the position of the

social advocacy group

Develops a statement that

communicates the position of the

social advocacy group, but lacks

detail or is misaligned

Does not develop a statement that

communicates the position of the

social advocacy group

6

5

Analysis:

Position

[SOC-320-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and description offers a comprehensive

perspective of the social advocacy

group’s position on the issue

Articulates the social advocacy

group’s position on the issue in detail

Articulates the social advocacy

group’s position on the issue, but

response lacks detail

Does not articulate the social

advocacy group’s position on the issue

6

Analysis:

Stereotypes

[SOC-320-02]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and draws comprehensive connections

between stereotypes and validity,

effects, and persistence

Evaluates prevalent stereotypes

regarding the issue, addressing the

validity, effects, and persistence of

said stereotypes

Evaluates prevalent stereotypes

regarding the issue, addressing the

validity, effects, and persistence,

but evaluation is cursory or

overlooks relevant factors

Does not evaluate prevalent

stereotypes regarding the issue

6

Analysis: Social

Change

[SOC-320-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and description is exceptionally clear

and contextualized

Describes recent social change

regarding the issue and supports

response with examples

Describes recent social change

regarding the issue and supports

response with examples, but

description is cursory or examples

are inappropriate

Does not describe recent social

change regarding the issue

8

Analysis:

Historical

Interpretations

[SOC-320-02]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers nuanced insight into the

relationship between historical

interpretations of the issue within

relevant social structures

Analyzes historical interpretations

of the issue within relevant social

structures and supports analysis

with evidence

Analyzes historical interpretations

of the issue within relevant social

structures and supports analysis

with evidence, but analysis is

cursory or evidence used is

inappropriate

Does not analyze historical

interpretations of issue

6

Analysis:

Modern

Interpretations

[SOC-320-02]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

offers nuanced insight into the

relationship between modern

interpretations of the issue within

relevant social structures

Analyzes modern interpretations

of the issue within relevant social

structures and supports analysis

with evidence

Analyzes modern interpretations

of the issue within relevant social

structures and supports analysis

with evidence, but analysis is

cursory or evidence used is

inappropriate

Does not analyze modern

interpretations of issue

6

Analysis:

Sociological

Theory

[SOC-320-03]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and application demonstrates a

sophisticated understanding of the

connections between sociological

theory and interpretations of the

issue

Applies appropriate sociological

theory to historical and modern

interpretations of the issue for

supporting the overall analysis

Applies sociological theory to

historical and modern

interpretations of the issue for

supporting the overall analysis, but

chosen theories are inappropriate

or application is cursory

Does not apply sociological theory

to historical and modern

interpretations of the issue

8

6

Conclusion:

Ethical

Challenges

[SOC-320-04]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and description is exceptionally clear

and contextualized

Describes the ethical challenges in

analyzing the issue and supports

response with examples

Describes the ethical challenges in

analyzing the issue and supports

the response with examples, but

examples used are misaligned or

description is cursory

Does not describe the ethical

challenges in analyzing the issue

6

Conclusion: Key

Points

[SOC-320-04]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and summarizes insights and

perspectives that were gained

through the incorporation of

evidence

Reviews key points of the analysis

and makes a universal statement

of position regarding the issue

Reviews key points of the analysis

and makes a universal statement

of position regarding the issue, but

review lacks detail or overlooks

relevant factors

Does not review key points of the

analysis

6

Conclusion:

Possible

Solutions

[SOC-320-01]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and solutions are well supported and

plausible

Determines possible effective

solutions that would lessen the

negative impact of the issue on

society

Determines possible solutions that

would lessen the negative impact

of the issue on society, but

solutions are inappropriate or lack

detail

Does not determine possible

effective solutions to lessen the

negative impact of the issue on

society

6

Conclusion: Final

Position

[SOC-320-04]

Meets “Proficient” criteria and is exceptionally clear and concise

Communicates final position on

the gender issue supported by

findings from the analysis

Communicates final position on

the gender issue, but is not

supported by the findings of the

analysis or lacks detail

Does not communicate the final

position on the gender issue

6

Articulation of

Response

Submission is free of errors related

to citations, grammar, spelling,

syntax, and organization and is

presented in a professional and

easy-to-read format

Submission has no major errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

that negatively impact readability

and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

that prevent understanding of

ideas

4

Total 100%

7

SOC 320 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Prompt

Order | Check Discount