Posted: April 20th, 2022

RESEARCH PROJECT: SOURCE ANALYSIS “the importance of lowering the divorce rate to keep families together.”

RESEARCH PROJECT: SOURCE ANALYSIS “the importance of lowering the divorce rate to keep families together.”

Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to both find sources that help you answer your research questions and
explore the different types of sources that are out there. In addition, you will analyze these sources to make
sure they are appropriate sources for your Research Project.

Approach
You should have four sources to help you learn more about your social issue. At least two of these
sources will need to be scholarly. (Our class reading and in-class work discussed scholarly versus
popular sources, as well as authoritative.)

There are FOUR STEPS for each Source Analysis:

1. SCHOLARY, AUTHORITATIVE, OR POPULAR SOURCE: Indicate if your source is a Scholarly,
Authoritative, or Popular Source and explain how you know.

2. SOURCE CITATION: Provide a breakdown of the citation, as shown below, and then put the parts
together into a full citation. (If you use a CLC database, the citation is provided, but you still will need to
show that you know what each part of the citation is.)
◦ Author(s):
◦ Title of the Source:
◦ Title of the Publication (title of the journal, website, book, etc.):
◦ Other Contributors (e.g. editor, narrator, director, etc.):
◦ Version/Edition/Volume:
◦ Number (if part of a sequence):
◦ Publisher (company or group responsible for publishing the source):
◦ Publication Date:
◦ Location (URL, page numbers, etc.):
◦ Full Source Citation: Now, provide the full source citation.

3. SOURCE SUMMARY (one or two paragraphs):
 The first sentence of the summary should include the type of source (may include publication), the
author(s) of the source, and the thesis or main point of the source.
 In the rest of the summary, you should include the supporting points for the author’s thesis (main point).
What evidence does the author use to prove their main point? How is logos, pathos, and ethos used by
the author?
 Your summary should show that you have a strong understanding of your source.

4. SOURCE EVALUATION
For the evaluation, be sure to reference the CRAP ranking sheet. You will need to address the following:

CURRENCY (rank from the CRAP ranking sheet 3-0):
◦ When was the source written?
◦ Is there a copyright date or date of publication?
◦ Is it current enough for your work?
RELIABILITY (rank from the CRAP ranking sheet 3-0):
◦ Where did the author get the information?
◦ Does the author provide sources for information either in the text or in a list at the end?
◦ Is the information accurate and error free?
◦ Can the information be corroborated with another source?
AUTHORITY OR AUTHOR/ORGANIZATION (rank from the CRAP ranking sheet 3-0):
◦ Who is responsible for the information? Are they reliable?
◦ Is there a person or organization listed as the author?
◦ Look up (or Google) the author to learn more about them.
◦ Can you figure out what makes the author an expert or valued opinion (credentials – education, career
field, college/university faculty in the field, experience)?
◦ If no person(s) is the author, is this organization credible?
PURPOSE/POINT OF VIEW (rank from the CRAP ranking sheet 3-0):
◦ Does the information seem fairly represented or is it biased?
◦ Scan the contents – Why was it written? (e.g. information, advice, advocacy, propaganda, opinion,
entertainment, sales, or another reason)
◦ Be able to spot point of view – Is the source or site fair? Is it affiliated with an organization that has a
particular point of view?
◦ Is the source balanced or biased? Does that matter for your purposes?

FINAL CRAP RANKING: Provide the total crap ranking number here. (If the ranking falls lower than 10,
you must justify why you will use the source.)

Submitting Your Source Analyses
Create one Microsoft Word document for the two source analyses due. For example, create one Word
document and include both Source Analysis #1 and Source Analysis #2 in the Word document. For Source
Analysis #3 and Source Analysis #4, you will include both of them in one Word document. These documents
are submitted in Canvas.

Scroll down for an example of a Source Analysis

Student Name
Course Number
Assignment Title
Date

SAMPLE SOURCE ANALYSIS
SOURCE #1
1. SCHOLARLY SOURCE — This source is peer reviewed, well sourced (list of references), and the
authors are experts.

2. SOURCE CITATION:
◦ Author(s): Dennis A. Johnson, Ed.D. and John Acquaviva, Ph.D.
◦ Title of the Source: “Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes.”
◦ Title of the Publication (journal, website, book, etc.): The Sports Journal
◦ Other Contributors (e.g. editor, narrator, director, etc.): n/a
◦ Version/Edition/Volume: volume 16
◦ Number (if part of a sequence): number 5
◦ Publisher (company or group responsible for publishing the source): n/a
◦ Publication Date: 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service
◦ Location (specific location of the information – URL, page numbers, etc.):

Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes

Full Source Citation:
Johnson, Dennis A. Ed.D. and John Acquaviva, Ph.D. “Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes.” The
Sports Journal, vol. 16, no. 5, 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service. http://thesportjournal.org/article/pointcounterpoint-paying-college-
athletes/

3. SOURCE SUMMARY:
In the The Sports Journal article “Point/Counterpoint: Paying College Athletes,” authors Dennis A.
Johnson and John Acquaviva, both professors of Sport Sciences at Wingate University, discuss the pros
and cons of paying college athletes to play. The article begins by describing how the NCAA became a
league and provides history from the mid-1900s when colleges recruited players that were not students to
pay to play. Next, Acquaviva presents multiple reasons as to why college athletes should not be paid
based on numerous main points: education is money, there are problems with payment, universities offer
more than an education, the athletic department has its role, and, athletes know the deal that they are
going into.
Johnson provides reasons as to why colleges should be paying college athletes to play. The
author describes four main points to the argument: athletic scholarships provide a “free education” is not
correct, athletes don’t know the “real” deal, the university offers more than education – it’s possible – but
not probable, and revenue sharing proposals from TV. In these points, numerous solutions are offered as
to how the players can be compensated for their play. Some examples of the proposals are to increase
scholarships to $2,000 more in order to provide living-expense money and another one is to pay each
player $300 per game.

4. SOURCE EVALUATION:
Currency (2): The article was written in 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service, which makes this a fairly current source for my research, but
this debate seems to change often right now about college athletes getting paid. This is a little dated for
such a current topic, which is why I gave the source a “2” for Currency.
Reliability (2): The article includes a “References” page at the end of the article with nine sources listed.
Within the article, the two authors cite the research they found. Three of these sources are from 2011 &
2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service. Custom Essay Services Cheap, which dates the information, but six others are from 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay and early 2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service. Some of the information
that I found in this source is similar to my Sports Illustrated article by Deborah Krause.
Authority of Author/Organization (3): The authors are Dennis A. Johnson and John Acquaviva, both
professors of Sport Sciences at Wingate University. These authors have also written three other articles
together for this journal related to the topic of paying college athletes. Johnson has been at the university
teaching in this field for 11 years, while John Acquaviva has been teaching in this field for 15 years with
four of the last years at Wingate University. The two authors presented at two conferences on this subject
in 2013 and 2014: 2024 – Essay Writing Service | Write My Essay For Me Without Delay.
Purpose/Point of View (3): This article was written for information about the paying college athlete debate
and showing the pros and cons of this topic. The publication is a peer-reviewed journal and not affiliated
with any “sides” of the debate. The information is presented fairly by the professors.

FINAL CRAP RANKING: 10

RUBRICS FOR SOURCE ANALYSIS FOR FAMILY AND DIVORCE ESSAY

Source #1 TYPE OF SOURCE
Correctly identifies type of source: popular, authoritative, or scholarly 2 to >1.0 pts
Meets Criteria 1 to >0.0 pts
Meets Most Criteria 0 pts
Meets Few Criteria
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource #1 CITATION
Correctly provides a breakdown of the source citation and the full citation 5 to >3.0 pts
Meets Criteria 3 to >1.0 pts
Meets Most Criteria 1 to >0 pts
Meets Few Criteria
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource #1 SUMMARY
Homework help – Summary is written in your own words. First sentence includes type of source, author(s) of the source, and the main point / thesis of the source. Homework help – Summary includes the support and evidence for the main point of the source. Homework help – Summary shows how logos, pathos, and ethos are addressed by the author(s). Homework help – Summary demonstrates a strong understanding of the source, 6 to >4.0 pts
Meets Criteria 4 to >1.0 pts
Meets Most Criteria 1 to >0 pts
Meets Few Criteria
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource #1 CRAP RANKING
Each prompt on the assignment sheet addressed for Currency, Reliability, Authority or Author/Organization, and Purpose/Point of View. 12 to >8.0 pts
Meets Criteria 8 to >4.0 pts
Meets Most Criteria 4 to >0 pts
Meets Few Criteria
12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource #2 TYPE OF SOURCE
Correctly identifies type of source: popular, authoritative, or scholarly 2 to >1.0 pts
Meets Criteria 1 to >0.0 pts
Meets Most Criteria 0 pts
Meets Few Criteria
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource #2 CITATION
Correctly provides a breakdown of the source citation and the full citation 5 to >3.0 pts
Meets Criteria 3 to >1.0 pts
Meets Most Criteria 1 to >0 pts
Meets Few Criteria
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource #2 SUMMARY
Homework help – Summary is written in your own words. First sentence includes type of source, author(s) of the source, and the main point / thesis of the source. Homework help – Summary includes the support and evidence for the main point of the source. Homework help – Summary shows how logos, pathos, and ethos are addressed by the author(s). Homework help – Summary demonstrates a strong understanding of the source, 6 to >4.0 pts
Meets Criteria 4 to >1.0 pts
Meets Most Criteria 1 to >0 pts
Meets Few Criteria
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource #2 CRAP RANKING
Each prompt on the assignment sheet addressed for Currency, Reliability, Authority or Author/Organization, and Purpose/Point of View. 12 to >8.0 pts
Meets Criteria 8 to >4.0 pts
Meets Most Criteria 4 to >0 pts
Meets Few Criteria
12 pts

Rhetorical Analysis Essay- PSA Rubrics
Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Requirements 20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
Addresses all aspects of the assignment thoroughly. Follows ace my homework – Ace tutors for Research Essay Pro UK Writings – APA format. 17 to >13.0 pts
Proficient
Addresses most aspects of the assignment. Follows ace my homework – Ace tutors for Research Essay Pro UK Writings – APA format mostly. 13 to >9.0 pts
Progressing
Addresses some aspects of the assignment. Some ace my homework – Ace tutors for Research Essay Pro UK Writings – APA format. 9 to >0 pts
Beginning
Does not address the assignment. Little ace my homework – Ace tutors for Research Essay Pro UK Writings – APA format.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage Conventions 20 to >17.0 pts
Advanced
Contains no errors that limit understanding. Offers advanced variety in sentence structure. Employs effective and engaging word choice. 17 to >13.0 pts
Proficient
Contains few errors that limit understanding. Offers variety in sentence structure. Employs effective word choice. 13 to >9.0 pts
Progressing
Contains errors that limit understanding. Offers some variety in sentence structure. Employs basic word choice. 9 to >0 pts
Beginning
Contains numerous errors that limit understanding and ineffective sentence structure and/or word choice.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience, Purpose, and Argument 40 to >34.0 pts
Advanced
Precisely identifies and offers thorough support for target audience, purpose, and argument for one PSA. 34 to >27.0 pts
Proficient
Identifies and offers support for target audience, purpose, and argument for one PSA. 27 to >19.0 pts
Progressing
Tries to identify and offers some support for target audience, purpose, and/or argument for one PSA. 19 to >0 pts
Beginning
Does not accurately identify target audience, purpose and/or argument.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport: Logos, Pathos, Ethos, & Larger Context 40 to >34.0 pts
Advanced
Provides numerous examples for each appeal and a detailed explanation of how the PSA illustrates the appeals. The connection to society is clearly articulated. 34 to >27.0 pts
Proficient
Provides sufficient examples for each appeal and a clear explanation of how the PSA illustrates the appeals. The connection to society is well explained. 27 to >19.0 pts
Proficient
Provides some examples for each appeal and attempts to explain how the PSA illustrates the appeals. The connection to society is weak. 19 to >0 pts
Beginning
Provides few examples and/or details from the PSA. The connection to society is inaccurate or missing.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrengths, Weaknesses, and Overall Success/Lack of Success 40 to >34.0 pts
Advanced
Provides numerous strengths and/or weaknesses. Get custom essay samples and course-specific study resources via course hero homework for you service – Include s specific examples from the analysis and/or PSA as support. Success or lack of success is well articulated. 34 to >27.0 pts
Proficient
Provides adequate strengths and/or weaknesses. Get custom essay samples and course-specific study resources via course hero homework for you service – Include s examples from the analysis and/or PSA as support. Success or lack of success is clarified. 27 to >19.0 pts
Progressing
Provides limited strengths and/or weaknesses. Missing support from the analysis and/or PSA. Success or lack of success is not clear. 19 to >0 pts
Beginning
Strengths and/or weaknesses are scarce or not clear, and little support from the analysis and/or PSA is offered. Ace my homework – Write my paper – Online assignment help tutors – Discussion of success is incomplete.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization 40 to >34.0 pts
Advanced
Structures writing as a logical flow of ideas using well- developed and tightly unified paragraphs linked together with smooth and clear transitions that enhance meaning. 34 to >27.0 pts
Proficient
Structures writing into a logical flow of ideas using developed and unified paragraphs linked together with transitions that support meaning. 27 to >19.0 pts
Progressing
Structures ideas in a disjointed progression of thought. Paragraphs are not unified and/or not related to each other specifically. 19 to >0 pts
Beginning
Exhibits a structure with limited logic and progression of thought. Paragraphs are underdeveloped and unrelated.
40 pts
Total Points: 200

————–

RESEARCH PROJECT: SOURCE ANALYSIS “the significance of lowering divorce rates in order to keep families together.”

Purpose

The goal of this assignment is to find sources that will help you answer your research questions as well as to find sources that will help you answer your research questions.

explore the different types of sources that are out there. In addition, you will analyze these sources to make

sure they are appropriate sources for your Research Project.

Approach

You should have four sources to help you learn more about your social issue. At least two of these

sources will need to be scholarly. (Our class reading and in-class work discussed scholarly versus

popular sources, as well as authoritative.)

There are FOUR STEPS for each Source Analysis:

1. SCHOLARY, AUTHORITATIVE, OR POPULAR SOURCE: Indicate if your source is a Scholarly,

Authoritative
PreviousNext

Order | Check Discount